My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-03-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-03-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2007 4:38:38 PM
Creation date
3/8/2007 2:32:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/12/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7A <br />Page 112 <br />also likely that some property owners will not be interested in any type of <br />redevelopment, and those buildings will remain unchanged. Others may proceed to <br />work with their smaller parcels and the development yield will include construction at <br />heights Power than the maximum allowed. lnl'nen these factors are considered along <br />with the other transitional height requirements, the expected resulting building forms <br />will possess significant variety in height as weft as strong architectural character <br />from ground-floor pedestrian-oriented features up to the upper stories, which will <br />contribute to an eclectic and interesting skyline. <br />Transition Heights: Three sides of the DPP boundary abut existing residential <br />neighborhoods. In the case of EI Camino Real, the plan borders mixed-density <br />residentia( properties to the southwest. Transitional height in this area is the most <br />restricted and includes cone-to-one step down, as well as a four-story limit adjacent <br />to these lots. This is the most conservative approach proposed in the Plan and is a <br />significant reduction from the existing 75-foot height allowance along EI Camino <br />Real in this area. The height limit in the adjacent R-4 neighborhood is 45 feet, which <br />is equivalent to four stories. The Draft DPP is compatible with the existing condition <br />in this area. <br />The Brewster Avenue and Maple Street boundaries make use of a different <br />transition strategy. in these areas, athree-story streetwall is required for atwenty- <br />foot deep stepback, behind which heights can increase to five stories up to the mid- <br />block line, and then progress up higher to eight stories. The Brewster and Maple <br />conditions do not include abutting properties as on EI Camino Real. Rather, in both <br />of these areas, the transition also includes the width of the street. <br />The existing zoning in both of these neighborhoods (Centennial and <br />Stambaugh/Heller) is R-5, which allows a 75-foot height limit (six to seven stories). <br />The existing zoning within the Draft DPP area (across the street from these <br />neighborhoods) allows seven stories. The Draft DPP with the 3 - 5 story block <br />frontage heights is actually more conservative in terms of height than current <br />regulations on these transition streets. It is noted that existing development in these <br />areas is not built to these permitted height limits; however, the overall transition <br />strategy thoughtfully considers existing construction heights with the lower streetwall <br />requirement and makes use of the stree# as a significant buffer between the <br />densifying downtown and the adjacent residential communities. Staff believes that <br />the DPP is also compatible in these areas. <br />Height in the Historic Do~!~ntown Gore: Height in context with existing historic <br />resources was addressed in the Draft DPP though a variety of suggested <br />mechanisms, including afive-story streetwall an Broadway and Main Street and <br />stepbacks for new construction adjacent to historic buildings. However, as previously <br />described, development involving historic resources must be considered on a case- <br />by-case basis. Thus, the height limits associated with historic resources in the Draft <br />DPP will need to be considered through the proposed process shown in Attachment <br />D, as referenced above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.