My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-03-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-03-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2007 4:38:38 PM
Creation date
3/8/2007 2:32:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/12/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7A <br />Page 3 <br />document reflects the lead agency's independent judgment and analysis. <br />The EIR concluded that all the environmental impacts could be mitigated to less-than <br />significant levels except for transportation and circulation, and long-term air emissions. <br />It is important to note that the Final EI R also included some important findings. They were: <br />The Downtown Precise Plan places priority on pedestrian safety, convenience, and <br />enjoyment over the automobile. <br />In general, the "Moderate Intensity" alternative is environmentally superior to other <br />alternatives. <br />The Downtown Precise Plan would benefit regional housing needs and provide <br />housing opportunities for those who work in Redwood City. This would result in <br />fewer trips, thereby reducing regional auto emissions and travel time. <br />The property owner of 601 Brewster Avenue appealed the certification of the Final EIR, <br />and the City Council considered the appeal on February 26. The City Council unanimously <br />denied the appeal, made findings, and by so doing upheld the certification of the Final EIR. <br />Alternatives <br />• Deny the Downtown Precise Pian by not approving the above entitlements. <br />Continue the public hearing and ask staff to further revise the draft Plan and <br />schedule it for additional review and discussion at a future meeting. <br />Fiscal Impact <br />It is difficult to project the fiscal impact of the Plan. A revitalized Downtown will certainly <br />attract more development. There will be more residential development in the downtown <br />with accompanying services and uses. This will result in more property tax revenue but <br />could also increase the need for city services. City service costs are monitored through the <br />budget review process. Special service levels associated with downtown will be further <br />assessed by the staff Downtown Management Team. The rate of development in <br />downtown will be monitored by the Planning Division as part of its responsibility for <br />administering the Plan and tracking the buildout within the Maximum Allowable Density limit <br />as established by the City Council. <br />Tom Passanisi Ji}I' kas <br />Principal Planner F~ anning . nag;~r •~~ > <br />t,_rf ~~ <br />Peter Ingram Ed Everett <br />Community Deve oprnent Director City Manager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.