Laserfiche WebLink
7A <br />Page 19 <br />Finding: The identified light and glare impact mitigation measure is <br />feasible and would reduce potential fight and glare impacts from exterior lighting <br />features and daytime fight reflection from the windows of the taller structures to a <br />/eve! which would not be environmentally significant. Implementation of this <br />measure would reduce this impact to a less-than significant level. <br />Il. CULTURAL. AND HISTruRIC RESE3URCES <br />A. Archaelogicallmpacts <br />Potential Impact 8-1: Given that the Precise Plan area is located on <br />alluvial soils, on the margin of San Francisco Bay near former wetlands, and <br />bisected by Redwood Creek and its tributaries, there is a high likelihood that <br />unrecorded archaeological resources exist in the area. New development <br />faci!i±ated by the Draft Precise Plan could disturb such existing unrecorded <br />archaeological resources in the Downtown area. <br />Mitigation $-1: Mitigation Measure 8-1 as described in the EIR p. 8-21 is <br />hereby adopted and shall be implemented as provided by the Mitigation <br />Monitoring Program. <br />Finding: The identified archaelogical mitigation measure is feasible and <br />would reduce potential archaelogical impacts from new development to a level <br />which would not be environmentally significant. implementation of this measure <br />would reduce this impact to ales-than-significanf level. <br />B. Historic Resources Impacts <br />Potential Impact $-~: Future development prnjectS that are otheRNicg <br />consistent with the Draft Precise Plan may cause a substantial adverse change <br />in either {a) the significance of one or more of the historic resources or potential <br />historic resources identified in EIR Table 8.1 (Historic and Potential Historic <br />Resource List), or (b) the significance of the existing Redwood City Main Street <br />District. Under the current (2006) CEQA Guidelines {section 15064.5(b)(1 }}, a <br />substantial adverse change includes demolition, destruction, relocation, or <br />alteration of one or more resources, such that the resource and/or the historic <br />district in which it is located is "materially impaired." The significance of a historic <br />resource is considered to be "materially impaired" when a project demolishes or <br />materially alters the physical characteristics that justify the determination of a <br />historic resource's significance {CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5jb]). Such an <br />adverse change to aCEQA-defined historic resource would constitute a <br />significant impacf (see criteria 1, 2, and 4 in subsection 8.3.1, "Significance <br />Criteria," above}. <br />AttylReso/Reso.1683 2 <br />030707 <br />