Laserfiche WebLink
7A <br />Page 29 <br />Mitigation 9-12. Due to right-of-way constraints, mitigation options at this <br />intersection are limited. Mitigation would require the addition of an exclusive <br />eastbound left-turn lane and converting the eastbound-shared left-through lane <br />into an exclusive through movement. This would allow changing from a current <br />spilt-phase operation (eastbound/westbound} to a protected left-turn phasing, <br />and would improve operation to LOS D in the AM peak hour and to LOS E in the <br />PM peak hour. However, implementation of this improvement is not deemed <br />feasible by the City due to the need to acquire right-of-way from adjacent <br />commercial frontage. Therefore, this impact is considered to be signibcant and <br />unavoidable. <br />Findings: This City Council of the City of Redwood City finds this impact <br />to be significant and unavoidable. Due to the need to acquire right-of-way from <br />adjacent commercial frontage, this mitigation option is deemed infeasible. This <br />impact is overridden by project benefits as set forth in the statement of overriding <br />considerations. <br />Impact 9-13: Project Contribution to Cumulative Impacts at the EI <br />Camino Real/ Jefferson Avenue Intersection. During the PM peak hour, the <br />addition of project traffic would increase average delay by five (5) seconds or <br />more at this intersection, which would already be operating at LOS E. This effect <br />would represent a significant impact. <br />Mitigation 9-13. Mitigating this impact would require adding a second <br />northbound left-turn lane on EI Camino Real, and converting the right-turn lane <br />into a shared through/right-turn lane. This improvement would necessitate lane <br />restriping and possible median modifications. Level of service with this <br />improvement would remain LOS E during the PM peak hour, but the increase in <br />delay resulting from project traffic would be less than 5 seconds. Any <br />improvement to Ei Camino Real would require Caltrans approval. At this time, <br />lacking Caltrans approval, implementation of this mitigation is not assured. <br />Therefore, this impact is considered to be significant and unavoidable. <br />Findings: The changes or alterations proposed by mitigation measure 9- <br />13are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of Caltrans and not the City of <br />Redwood City. Caltrans can and should adopt proposed mitigation measure 9- <br />13. <br />Impact 9-14: Project Contribution to Cumulative impacts at the <br />Middlefield Roadf Woodside Road intersection. During the AM and PM peak <br />hour, the project traffic would increase average delay by five {5) seconds or more <br />at the intersection of Middlefield RoadM~oodside Road, which would already be <br />operating at LOS E/F. This effect would represent a significant impacf (see <br />criteria for "intersection Impacts," in subsection 9.4.1, "Significance Criteria," <br />above.) <br />Atty/Reso/Reso.1683 ~ 2 <br />030707 <br />