Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Enti Verifeeation Enti Re uirements <br /> southbound left turns (Mitigations 9-3 jaJ or <br /> 9-3jb]}, or the impact on pedestrian signal <br /> sequencing with split phase signal <br /> operation (Mitigation 9-3jcJ), may potentially <br /> degrade the Downtown pedestrian <br /> environment and decrease pedestrian <br /> safety, comfort, and convenience; and be <br /> inconsistent with existing and proposed City <br /> policies giving priority to the Downtown <br /> pedestrian environment; the City may <br /> choose to avoid the three mitigation options <br /> identified above in the interest of protecting <br /> the pedestrian environment, This choice <br /> would result in a significant unavoidable <br /> impact under the current CEOP, and City <br /> criteria for "Intersection Im acts:' <br />Impact 9-4: Impact on BroadwaylJeiferson Mitigation 9-4. Add an exGusive City; fair-share City If and when improvements <br />Avenue Intersection--Maximum Intensity northbound left-turn lane on Broadway, and reimbursement adopted, City shall conduct <br />Precise Plan Alternative. During the PM convert the existing northbound shared left- from future annual traffic monitoring at <br />peak hour, the Maximum Intensity project through right lane into a shared individual this intersection and <br />traffic increment would reduce operation to through/right-turn lane, These changes project implement fair-share <br />LOS F and increase average delay by more would result in an acceptable LOS D under applicants. requirement when level of <br />than five (5) seconds at the Broadway/ the Maximum Intensity alternative, thereby service reaches LOS E <br />Jefferson Avenue intersection. This change reducing this impact to a less-than- (average decay of greater than <br />would represent a significant impact. significanf level. 55 seconds). <br /> or <br /> Because this mitigation would result in the <br /> loss of sidewalk at corner bulb-outs, <br /> degrading the existing and future <br /> pedestrian environment and sidewalk <br /> dining opportunities, and would therefore <br /> be inconsistent with City policies giving <br /> priority to the Downtown pedestrian <br /> environment, the City may choose to avoid <br /> these intersection modifications in the <br /> interest of protecting the pedestrian <br /> environment. This choice would result in a <br /> significant unavoidable impact under <br /> current CEQA and City criteria for <br /> "Intersection lm acts." <br />Impact 9-5: Impact BroadwaylMiddle#Feld Mitigation 9-5. The intersection of City; fair-share City If and when improvements <br />Road Intersection--Maximum Intensity Broadway/Middlefield Road is currently a 4- reimbursement adopted, City shall conduct <br />Precise Plan Alternative. During the PM way stop controlled facility, Signalizing the from future annual traffic monitoring at <br />the Maximum Intensity project <br />peak hour intersection (2-phase control} would result individual this intersection and <br />, <br />traffic increment would reduce operation to <br />LOS E and increase average delay by more in LOS B operations under Maximum <br />Intensity conditions. Implementation of this project <br />applicants. implement fair-share <br />requirement when level of <br />y <br />D <br />Pace g U:IMy DacumentslDcwnfown Precise PiantCC staff reportslCC 3.12.doc13.l2.07 Exhibitsuttfachmenf A mif.monitoring checklist 655.d N D <br />