Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and liming Signature Date <br /> Enti Verification Enti Re uirements <br />Impact 9-7: impact Middtefield Roadl Mitigation 9-2. The addition of a second <br />tbound left-turn lane on Woodside Road City; fair•share <br />reimbursement City; C/CAG If and when improvements <br />adopted, City shalt implement <br />Woodside Raad (SR 64} intersection-- <br />Maximum Intensity Precise Plan eas <br />(SR 84) would achieve LOS D wnditions from future <br />l improvements and fair-share <br />Individual <br />requirement <br />Alternative. During the PM peak hour, the under Maximum Intensity conditions. This <br />however, would require <br />improvement Individua <br />project . <br />projects may require <br />Maximum Intensity project traffic increment <br />would increase by more than five (5} seconds , <br />intersection widening to provide adequate applicants. Transportation Demand <br />Management (TDM) plans per <br />the average delay at the <br />i length for the additional left-turn Dane. The <br />improvement would also require Caltrans C/CAG adopted guideli;ti~s. <br />s <br />Middlefield/Woodside intersection, which <br />already operating at LOS E. This change approval, which is uncertain at this time. <br />would represent a signiTrcant impact. Therefore, because implementation of this <br /> improvement is not assured, this <br /> intersection impact would be a signifrcant <br /> unavoidable fm act. <br />Impact 9-3: Impact on Middlefield Roadi Mitigation 9-3(a). Restripe the southbound City; fair-share <br />reimbursement City if and when improvements <br />adopted, Ciiy shall conduct <br />Jefferson Avenue Intersection-Maximum <br />Precise Plan Alternative. During <br />Intensit approach of Middlefield Road to one <br />through lane and one right-turn lane, and from future noandrtng at <br />ti <br />tl <br />y <br />the PM peak hour, the Maximum Intensity prohibit southbound left turns. These <br />changes would result in an acceptable LOS individual <br />project ersec <br />o <br />this n <br />implement fair-share <br />project traffic increment would reduce the <br />level of service to L05 E and increase D under the Max[mum Intensity alternative, applicants. requirement when level of <br />service reaches LO5 E <br />average delay by more than five (5) seconds thereby reducing the project impact to a <br />less-than-significant level. (average delay of greater than <br />at the intersection of Middlefield Road! 55 seconds). <br />Jefferson Avenue. This change would <br />represent a significant impact. or <br />Mitigation 9-3(b). Implement Mitigation 9- <br /> 3(a) plus restripe northbound Middlefield <br /> Road to two (2) left-turn lanes and one <br /> shared through/right-turn Zane. These <br /> changes would result in an acceptable LOS <br /> p under the Maximum Intensity buildout <br /> alternative, thereby reducing the project <br /> impact to aless-than-signiFicant level. <br /> or <br /> Mitigation 9-3(c). Resfripe the southbound <br /> Middtefield Road approach to a shared left- <br /> through lane and one right-turn lane; <br /> restripe northbound Middlefield Road to <br /> one left-turn lane, one shared left-through <br /> and one right-turn lane; and <br />lane <br /> , <br />implement a split phase signak operation for <br /> northbound and southbound Middlefield <br /> Road. These changes would result in an <br /> acceptable LOS D under the Maximum <br /> intensity alternative, thereby reducing the <br /> project impact to aless-than-significant <br /> level. <br /> or <br /> Because either the diversion of traffic to <br /> pedestrian corridors on Broadway and <br /> Middlefield resultin from rohibitin <br />(Q <br /> (D <br />U:1My iJocumentslDowntown Precse PIanICC sta{f reporislCC 3.12.docl3. 12.07 ExhitirtslAttachmenf A mil. monifodng checklist 655.dr~ D <br />r'aae 8 <br />