My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-03-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-03-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2007 10:06:32 AM
Creation date
3/22/2007 1:36:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
3/26/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7A <br />Page 6 <br />Recommendation: Continue #o enforce sign code violations on acomplaint-only basis until <br />and unless additional staffing becomes available. <br />Schools: Now can the City collaborate with school districts to plan for additional students <br />and schools in the Downtown area? How do other cities do it? What examples are (here? <br />Contact the school districts for more information. <br />Response: <br />School districts are responsible for the planning and selection of school sites. Although <br />school districts do not have to comply with local zoning, State law requires extended <br />coordination and communication between cities and local school districts when districts <br />prepare long range plans for school siting. At the same time cities are required to contact <br />school districts ahead of consideration of General Plan Amendments {as was done for the <br />Down#own Precise Plan and the EIR). <br />A Downtown area normally doesn't generate the student demand and need for schools as <br />other areas of cities do. Subsequent studies conducted for the Downtown Precise Plan <br />Environmental Impact Report indicate that the student ratio far K - 8 is smaller for <br />downtowns than the rest of the City. The ratio far Grades 9-12 is slightly higher. See <br />following table: <br />Potential Students per Household <br /> K-8 9-12 __ <br />City-wide School <br />District ratios 0.954 0.10 <br />_ <br />Actual Downtown ~ 0 30 0.13 J <br />1 <br />Ratios <br />Source: Draft Environmental impact Report and Final tnvironmentai impact Keport <br />for the Downtown Precise Plan. Section 10.74 (Public Services, Utilities, and <br />Infrastructure). <br />The "Actual Downtown Ratios° are based on real data from the Franklin Street and City <br />Center Plaza projects. During preparation of the Environmental Impact Report, the City <br />shared this information with the Redwood City School District and they have agreed that <br />the lower ratios are more realistic numbers for high density housing in a downtown setting. <br />The Sequoia Union High School District and the Redwood City School District currently <br />collect school impact fees to offset a project's impact on local facilities. The impact fees, <br />as determined by State law, limit the ability of local entities to impose additional funds upon <br />development projects. The funds are to be used for capital improvements. <br />Since the meeting on March 12~h, staff contacted the Redwood City School District and the <br />Sequoia Union High School District to discuss the siting of schools in the Downtown1. <br />Although there eventually could be a need for a new school (750 K-8 students and 325 9- <br />'Conversations with Ed Lavigne, Assistant Superintendent, Sequoia Union High School District; Raul <br />Parungao, Chief Business Official, and Jan Christensen, Superintendent, Redwood City School District, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.