My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res07 14769
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Res07 14769
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2007 9:14:11 AM
Creation date
4/5/2007 9:06:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
3/26/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />W --~ <br />IDEN~Ii~D IMPACT <br />RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE <br />Implementation <br />Monitoring and <br />Timing <br />Signature <br />Date <br />~I ~ Enti Verification Enti R uirements <br />v ~ mortars, and pe:>tles; and dark friable soil <br />O containing shell and bone dietary debris, <br />~ heat-affected rock, or human burials. <br />(p Historic-period resources indude stone or <br />N adobe foundations or walls; structures and <br />~ remains with square nails; and refuse <br />~ deposits or bottle dumps, often located in <br />00 old wells or privies. 1f human remains are <br />to found, special rules set forth in State Health <br /> and Safety Code: section 7050.5 and CEQA <br /> Guidelines section 15126.4(b} shall apply. <br /> Implementation of this measure would <br /> reduce this impact to a less-fhart- <br /> si rtifcartt level. <br />Impact 8-2: Potential Destruction or Mitigation 8-2. Generally, for any future City; individual City During project-speafic <br />environmental review; <br />Degradation of Historic Resources. Future <br />i discaetionary action within the Precise Plan <br />through the <br />area that the City determines project <br />applicants ~.ondition of grading permit <br />se <br />development projects that are otherw <br />consistent with the Draft Predse Plan may , <br />CEQA-required Initial Study review process, <br />" <br />" issuance; field verify <br />implementation during grading <br />cause a substantial adverse change in either substantial adverse change <br />may cause a and construction <br />(a) the significance of one or more of the in one or more of the resources spedfied in . <br />historic resources or potential historic the Historic or Potential Historic Resources <br />resources identified in EIR Table 8.1 (Historic List (Table 8.1 ), the City shall require <br />Resource List), or (b) the significance of the project compliance with CEQA <br />existing Redwood City Main Street District. requirements applicable at that time. <br />Under the current (2006) CEQA Guidelines <br />(section 15064.5(b)(1)), asubstantial adverse For discretionary actions that may cause a <br />" <br />change includes demolition, destruction, to a resource <br />"substantial adverse change <br />" <br />relocation, or alteration of one or more Historic <br />identified in Table 8.1 as a <br />resources, such that the resource andfor the Resource Under CE(~A" (listed or eligible <br />historic district in which it is located is for listing in the National Register or <br />"materially impaired" The significance of a California Register, or listed as a Local <br />historic resource is considered to be Landmark), the Cify shall prepare either an <br />"materially impaired" when a project EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration that <br />demolishes or materially alters the physical incudes mitigation for the potential change. <br />characteristics thatjustify the determination of <br />a historic resource's significance (CEQA For discretionary actions that may cause a <br />" <br />Guidelines section 15064.5[bj}. Such an to a resource <br />"substantial adverse change <br />adverse change to aCEQA-defined historic identified in Table 8.1 as a "Potential <br />" <br />" <br />resource would constitute a sigrtiFcant not <br />( <br />Historic Resource Under CEQA <br />" <br />~t <br />rmA ), <br />previously listed, but of historic interest <br />S ~ the City shall treat the property as a historic <br />O resource and prepare either an EIR or <br />~ j Mitigated Negative Decaration that <br />~ ~ includes mitigation for the potential change, <br />~ l7~ or the applicant may conduct a historic <br />W ~ resource survey meeting the requirements <br /> of Public Resources Code secGan <br /> 5024.1 to determine to Ci satisfaction <br />Pace 4 U:IMy t?ocumen?s'~Gowntaw?~ Precise P?antCC staff rerortslCC 3.12. doct3.12.07 ExhihifslAt?achment A mil. mo~iton.'ng checklist 655.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.