Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING VERIF{CATION <br />IDEND IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Enti Verification Enti Re uirements <br />~~,,,,c~L~ <br />Impaci~= impact Middlefield Roadf Mitigation 9-2. The addition of a second City; fair-share <br />t City; C/CAG If and when improvements <br />City shall implement <br />adopted <br />Woodsicf~Road (SR 84) Intersection-- <br />i eastbound left-turn lane on Woodside Road <br />(SR 84) would achieve LOS D conditions reimbursemen <br />from future , <br />improvements and fair-share <br />an <br />Maximur~]ntensity Precise P <br />Alternat~. During the PM peak hour, the under Maximum intensity conditions. This individual <br />t requirement. Individual <br />projects may require <br />MaximuntDintensity project traffic increment improvement, however, would require <br />intersection widening to provide adequate projec <br />applicants. Transportation Demand <br />would increase b more than five 5) seconds <br />y ( length for the additional left-turn lane. The Management (TDM) plans per <br />the aver delay at the <br />Middlefi oodside intersection, which is <br />improvement would also require Caltrans CICAG adopted guidelir~irs. <br />already operating at LOS E. This change approval, which is uncertain at this time. <br />would represent a significant impact Therefore, because implementation of this <br /> improvement is not assured, this <br /> intersection impact would be a significant <br /> unavoidable im ct. <br />Impact 9-3: Impact on Middlefield Road! Mitigation 9-3(a). Restripe the southbound City; fair-share City <br />reimbursement If and when improvements <br />adopted, City shall conduct <br />Jefferson Avenue Intersection--Maximum <br />i <br />D approach of Middlefield Road to one <br />through lane and one right-turn lane, and from future annual traffic monitoring at <br />ng <br />ur <br />Intensity Precise Ptan Alternative. <br />the PM peak hour, the Maximum Intensity prohibit southbound left turns. These individual this intersection and <br />implement fair-share <br />project traffic increment would reduce the chan es would result in an acceptable LOS project <br />9 <br />D under the Maximum Intensity alternative, applicants. re uirement when level of <br />q <br />level of service to LOS E and increase <br />average delay by more than five {5) seconds thereby reducng the project impact to a service reaches LOS E <br />(average delay of greater than <br />at the intersection of Middlefield Road/ Jess-Phan-significant level. 55 seconds). <br />Jefferson Avenue. This change would <br />represent a sigrrffrcant impact. <br />or <br />Mitigation S-3(b). Implement Mitigation 9- <br /> 3(a) plus restripe northbound Middlefield <br /> Road to two {2) left-turn lanes and one <br /> shared throughlrigh#-turn Pane. These <br /> changes would result in an acceptable LOS <br /> D under the Maximum Intensity buildout <br /> alternative, thereby reducing the project <br /> impact to a lesa~-than-significant level. <br /> or <br /> Mitigation 9-3(c). Restripe the southbound <br /> Middlefield Roast approach to a shared left- <br /> through lane and one right-turn lane; <br /> restripe northbound Middlefield Road to <br /> one left-turn lane, one shared left-through <br /> and one right turn lane; and <br />lane <br /> , <br />implement a split phase signal operation for <br /> northbound and southbound Middlefield <br /> Road. These changes would result in an <br />~ acceptable LOS D under the Maximum <br /> Intensity alternative, thereby reducing the <br />= <br />~ , project impact to a less-fhan-sigrtifrcant <br />~ ~ level. <br />~ ~ <br />W ~ or <br />Because either the diversion of traffic to <br /> pedestrian corridors on Broadway and <br /> Middlefield resuitin from rohibitin <br /> <br />UaMy DocurrentslDowntown Precise PIar,ICC staff r2portstCC 3.12.doc13.12.07 ExhrhifscAfachment A mil. mrnitorag c"eckli;t 655.doc <br />Page 8 <br />