Res07 14769 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~ MONITORING VERIFICATION IDEI~I'~D IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date ~ Ent' Vertflcation Enti R uirements m may choose to avoid this intersection ~ modification in the interest of protecting the ;p pedestrian environment This choice would N result in a signi'ficanf unavoidable impact ~ based on current CEOA and City criteria for "Intersection Im acts" _.. Impact ~8: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-18. This impact would be City; fair-share t b i City; ClCAG if and when improvemegts City shall conduct .adopted Cumula~3e Empacts at the Bay Road! mitigated by implementing the Woodside which requires Road Widening project ursemen re m from future , annual trafficmonitoring at Woodside Road Intersection. During the project-generated traffic would eak hour PM , Caltrans approval. That project is not fully individual this intersection and l f , p increase average delay by five (5) seconds or funded, nor has a design been approved by implementation of this Therefore Caltrans project applicants. air-share imp ement requirement when level of more at this intersection, which already would be operating at LOS F. This effect would , . mitigation is not assured, and this impact is service reaches LOS E (average delay of greater than represent a significant impact. considered significant and unavoidable. 55 seconds). individual projects may require Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plans per ClCAG ado ted uidelines. Impact 9-19: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-19(a). Add an eastbound !eft- Mitigation N!A N/A Cumulative Impacts at the Veterans turn lane on Whipple Avenue. This modification would mitigate impacts in the considered not feasible by City Boulevard/Whipple Avenue Intersection. In the AM peak hour, project traffic would PM peak hour, but not in the AM peak hour. reduce operation from LOS D to LOS F at this to addition, this mitigation would require intersection. In the PM peak hour, project acquisition of right-of-way from commercial traffic would increase average delay by five frontage (including a gas station) and is (5) seconds or more at this intersection, which therefore not considered feasible by the would already be operating at LOS F. These City. This impact therefore would be effects would represent a significant impact significant and unavoidable. or or or or Mitigation 9-19(b). AS a feasible option, City; fair-share Gity If and when improvements add a second westbound left-turn lane on reimbursement adopted, City shall conduct Whipple Avenue. This modification would from future annual traffic monitoring at reduce the level of impact, but not to a less- individual this intersection and than-significant level (i.e., would not project implement fair-share mitigate either the AM or the PM peak hour applicants. requirement when level of impa.ct). Therefore, although reduced, this service reaches LOE E impact would remain significant and (average delay of greater than unavoidable. 55 seconds . !m ct 9-20: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-20(a). Restripe eastbound City; fair-share City if and when improvements Ci shall conduct adopted tY Cu letive tmpacts at the Veterans ~d/Brewster Avenue Intersection. B Brewster Avenue to one left-turn lane and one shared left-through-right tum lane. reimbursement from future , annual traffic monitoring at and thi i t ti o Duriagdbe PM peak hour, project-generated Signal operations would need to be individual s n ersec on im lement fair-share P trat~ 6~uld reduce operation to LOS F and changed to allow for split phasing for the eastbound/westbound Brewster project applicants. requirement when level of increase delay by five (5) seconds or more at Page 17 UaMy QocumerlslCewr?towr. Precise PIar4CC staff reportslCC 3.12.doc13.12.07 ExhibitslAtfachmert A mrt.m~~nitoring checklist 655.doc