Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />W .-- <br />II~D IMPACT <br />IDEN <br />RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE <br />Implementation <br />Monitoring and <br />Timing <br />Signature <br />Date <br />V Enti Verification Enti R uirements <br />this in~r~ction. This effect would represent approaches. These improvements would service reacthes LOS E <br />a signifiQrtt impact. reduce this impact, but not to a less-than- (average delay of greater than <br />~ significant level (i.e., wrould not fully mitigate 55 seconds). <br />~p either the AM or PM peak hour impacts). <br />N Therefore, this impact would be significant <br />~ artd unavoidable. <br />~ or <br />W <br />W <br />Mitigation 9-20(b). Add a second <br /> eastbound left-turn lane on Brewster <br /> Avenue. implementation of this measure <br /> would improve PM peak hour operations to <br /> LOS D, resulting in ales-than-significant <br /> impact. <br /> or <br /> t3ecause: (a) Mitigation 9-20(a) would <br /> result in pedestrians on each side of <br /> Brewster receiving a walk signal to cross <br /> Veterans Boulevard at separate times <br /> during the signal cycle, instead of the <br /> overlapping walk signal phases that now <br /> occur, thereby increasing delay for <br /> pedestrians and negatively impacting <br /> pedestrian convenience and safety; (b) <br /> Mitigation 9-2D(b) would require the <br /> elimination of curbside-parking spaces and <br /> would preclude future pedestrian <br /> enhancements such as corner bulb-outs <br /> that would reduce pedestrian exposure to <br /> traffic; and (c) these effects would be <br /> inconsistent with City po[iaes giving priority <br /> to the Downtown pedestrian environment; <br /> the City may choose to avoid the two <br /> mitigation options identified above in the <br /> interest of protecting the pedestrian <br /> environment. This choice would result in a <br /> signit'rcant unavoidable impact under <br /> current CEQA and City criteria for <br /> "Intersection Im acts " <br />Imp 9-21: Project Contribution to <br />r Mitigation 9-21. Right-of-way constraints <br />due to the adjacent US 101 on- and off- infrastructure <br />improvements Ciry: C/CAG During project-speafic <br />environmental review <br />ative Impacts at the Veterans <br />Cu <br />BouT~iraSClNVoodside Road Intersection. In ramps precude any feasible mitigation. considered not <br />the ak hour, project traffic would Therefore, the protect contribution to this <br />f <br />f feasible by City: <br />however <br />incr sverage delay by five (5) seconds or ican <br />cumulative impact represents a signi , <br />Woodside Road <br />mores is intersection, which already would unavoidable impact. is part of CMP <br />be operating at LOS F. This effect would roadway <br />re resent a si niticant im act. <br />Page 78 U:4My DocumentsiDownfow!- Precise PlantCC staff rc:portslCC 312.docl3. f 2.07 ExhibrtstAtta:hment A mif. monitoring checklist 655.doc <br />