Laserfiche WebLink
9A <br /> Page 53 <br /> • No ingress/egress near the nursery school <br /> • Step back the rear of the building and make the top floor narrower fio <br /> reduce shadow <br /> • Deiay project�r future hearings to allow more time for community to <br /> respond anci refute erroneous reports <br /> • GROLTP submitted a graphic of suggested traffic fl�w <br /> (the following solutions wc�•e subrnitted by a tabte�articipant irt Zvriti�zg) <br /> o A comprehensive traffic analysis should he con.ducted on Hogan at <br /> Woodside,Kentfield at Woodside and Horgan at Newcastle <br /> o Can we h.ave bollarcl ulstalled at the encl of N°wcastle at Horgan to <br /> restrict pass through traffic on Newcastle? <br /> o Can traffic conizol be im�osed on f-lorgazz and on Kentfield? <br /> o The construction plan looks reasonable if the top floor is removed <br /> 4. Is tlzere an alternate Iand use for the urea that zvould better serve Redwaod <br /> City? <br /> • Group did not came up with alternate la�d use <br /> 5. How wouTd this alternafie land use impact Redwood City? <br /> GROUP4 <br /> 1. What could ve the public benefit of the proposed Woodside Vitias project? <br /> • Provides needed housing <br /> 2. What are your concerns regarding t'he proposed project? <br /> • Excessive density <br /> • No similar development on Woodside Road <br /> • Unfaix comparison to 1 bedrooz�.apartments in building next door <br /> � Traffic Safety issues <br /> • No West egress into Woadside Road at the signal <br /> • �Nill worsen traffic gouzg Vl�est on Woodside <br /> • Not enough trees and green space <br /> • Building is too high <br /> • Air quality <br /> • Loss of home vahte <br /> 3. How eould your concerns be addressedlsolved? <br /> • Reduce size and occupancy of building <br /> • Build 3 storzes with 7 iulits per siory <br /> • More comprehensive traffic shidy. Review Kentfield <br /> • Ingress/egress to signaled intersection on Woodside Road <br />