Laserfiche WebLink
9A <br /> Page 54 <br /> 4. Is therc an alternate land use for the area that would better serve Redwood <br /> City? <br /> • Small hotel <br /> � Park <br /> • Day care cenler <br /> 5. How would this alternate land use impact Redwood City? <br /> • No hotels on Woodside Rd. <br /> • Redwood City needs more parks <br /> GROUP 5 <br /> 1. Wliat could be the public benefit of the proposed Woodside Viilas project? <br /> • Group did not see benefits <br /> 2. What are your concerns regarding tl2e proposed �•oject? <br /> • Refer to Becker letter read to the entire group during the question and <br /> an.swer period and sul�mitted with Group 3's notes <br /> • Size,height, density and number of units <br /> • Safety,l4 to T6 curb cuts within 100 feet af Horgan <br /> • Large number of driveways and curb cuts on Horgan presents greater traffic <br /> safery concerns <br /> • Concern that traffic sh.idy is inadequafie <br /> • Project size would adversely affect quality of life of existing nearby residents <br /> • Noise <br /> • Privacy(visual and sound} <br /> • Shade/shadows which will e€fect property values <br /> • During development the foundation excavation could spread existing <br /> �.nderground fuel spillage <br /> • Will filling station mai:ntain appearance L�pgrades developer is paying for? <br /> � Negative declaration didn't seem.to address ground contamination. <br /> 3. How cou�c�your concerns be addressed/solved? <br /> = Y Y�\�llld iir� �o s�e�nare extensive enviran.mert�l cc,�ument i..��re;tig.'a.}2:":b <br /> contamination of property <br /> 4. Is there an aIternate land use for the ctreu that would better serve Redwood <br /> City? <br /> • Group did not come up with alternate land use <br /> 5. I-iow would tltis alternate land use irnpact Redwood City? <br /> GROUP 6 <br /> 1. What could be the p7cblic benefit of the proposed Woodside ViTlas project? <br />