Laserfiche WebLink
9A <br /> Page 55 <br /> • no benefit to the public with the project as proposed,5 iow uzcomc tulits not <br /> wiihstanding, does z�ot outweigh negatives. <br /> • If space were developed well as a bank,srnall medical facility,smaller <br /> complex no higher than 3 stories,group would support it. <br /> • housing <br /> 2. What are your concerns regarding the proposed project? <br /> • Concemed aUout gas station leakage and pollution that is there now where <br /> the parking lot would be. Need further environmental study <br /> • Develaper not realistic to thin they can get 600,000 ta 900,000 for a 1300 <br /> square foot can�'o cverlooking a smelly,�eaking gas stat�c::0�1 Woodside <br /> Road. <br /> • Density of project,inconvenience of constructionequipixient, dirf and noise <br /> pollution <br /> • Biinci spot created by Woodside for people comin�;out of Horgaz�t <br /> • If need emcrgency access in a disaster,not adequate u�gress/egress <br /> • Increased dan.ger to pedestrians and animals <br /> • Poor traffic studies not based in reality <br /> • Weekend bottlen.ecks already exist <br /> . Kentfield at Woodside Rd lights are dangerous because left hirning <br /> East/West traffic onto Woodside ulterferes with the rest of traffic. Lights are <br /> already too long <br /> • Redwood trees develaper plans to plant along back will create too much <br /> shadow all year long <br /> • Height of building will create shadow on hou.se on Danbtiry and maybe back <br /> yards on other streets <br /> • State regulations pushing developrnent approval by City is conflict of in#erest <br /> between City and State <br /> • Neighbors need more advanced notic� ior zhese mee�irtgs tiiar�9 days <br /> • Too much t.r.affic <br /> • City gets more taxes t�ut property values would be lo,cvered <br /> • Provides less desirable housing than might otherwise be provic�ed in that <br /> s�ace <br /> • Negative sen.se of community-nof in best interest of the neighborhood. It is <br /> high density which the neighborhood is not. <br /> • Stran�e zoning laws, Permit for this type of building is incorrect. Hei�ht and <br /> densi.ty is not realistic for neighUorhood <br /> 3. Hoiv could your concerns be addressed/solved? <br /> • Downscale project <br /> 4. Is tltere an alter�nate land use for the area that would better serve Redwood <br /> Cit�? <br /> • Bank plan with traffic 9:00-5:00 looks better than a fast food restatirant or 7- <br /> story building <br /> • Medical facility <br />