Laserfiche WebLink
9A <br /> Pag�ge 64 <br /> RTD Test !?e�!�!±�, 2006 <br /> RTD tested nine locations an the project site at 8-, 10-, 12- and 15-foot depths, which are <br /> summarized in Table 1 of RTD's repart (Attachment B to the IS/MND). The results show that all of <br /> the samp[es collected from 8-, 10- and 12-foot depths were below the laboratory reparting limits <br /> for gasoline-related petroleum hydrocarbons. Trace levels of Ethyl-benzar�e, Xylenes and MTBE <br /> were detected at the 15-foot dep±h at only five of the nine locations. None of these concentrations <br /> were abave the Environmental Screening Level established by the San �rancisco Bay Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB}. <br /> Geomega lnc. Numar� Health Risk Assessment, 2�Q? <br /> The San Mateo County Health Department requested a Human Health Risk Assessment be <br /> conducted for the proposed development at the project site. The Risk Assessmen#was prepared <br /> by Geomega inc. and daied tviarcn 2, 2007. This repuri 5uppien�ents �xist�ng information on soil <br /> and water contaminants. The report focused on the potential for cantamination in groundwater <br /> originating from spills at the Gas & Shop site that has traveled beneath the project site to enter the <br /> air within the underground parking garage. The report states that based on consistently <br /> conservative estimates, with a large margin of sa#ety, that migration of toxics from groundwater <br /> info the parking garage will not be of concern for future onsite residents. <br /> Conclusions <br /> The proposed project will require excavation down to 10.5 feet below grade for #he basement, and <br /> 12.5 feet below grade for the eleva#or pit. Because there are no toxics detectabie until a depth of <br /> 15 feet, and even at that dep#h the measured toxics are within acceptable limits provided by <br /> SFBRWQCB and are focated in the groundwater, there are no significant negative impacts from <br /> toxics in the sail or groundwater associated with construction or occupancy of the propased <br /> project. The proposed projec# is also bound by the mitigation adopted with the Planning <br /> Commission's approval of the !S/MND. <br />