Laserfiche WebLink
6.1 E <br /> Page 13 <br /> PROAOSF.D NORK PROCkAM, SC4iEU0LE .4ND HUDGF.T FOR 7'l1E Pttb:tiF:RVF: AT l2EDWUOD SFfORES <br /> AfAlifll +_007 <br /> evaluate idenfitied potential impacts in comparison to the CEQA signiiicancc criteria approved in <br /> Subtask A.7, and incorporate mitigation measures as identi�ed in the traffic study.ln preparing this <br /> worlc prc>gran�and budget, I.SA has assumed I:hat the tratfic study will contain adequate information <br /> and analysis to address potential impacts related to traffic,transit,pedestrian and hicycle circulation, <br /> parking, and cumulative i�npacts. <br /> Tn preparation of the Traffic and Circulation suUseciion oEthe EIR for the proposed projects, the <br /> following tasks would be completed: <br /> • C�nd�sct a site reconnaissance. C'onduct a reco7n.aissa;ice to verify traffic and circulation <br /> conditions at the project site. <br /> . Peer review of tlre Traf�c Study. Peer review and evaluate the Fehr and Peers traffic study for <br /> adeq�.iacy and accuracy. <br /> • Descrihe traffic and cireulativ►r conditions. Describe the regional and site-specific traffie and <br /> circutation conditions for the project,based on review of available trafFic reports and oiher <br /> technical reports for the project sites. <br /> • Describe potential inrpacts. Summarize potential traffic and circulation impacts related to the <br /> proposed project bas�d on the Fehr and Peers traffic study and otner available technical reports. <br /> This will include potential impacts on pedestrian and bicycle circulation,transit and parking, and <br /> the impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed elementary school. <br /> • Desc:ribe existing local policies. Describe existing local poIicies from the Circulation Eleme;7t of <br /> the Redwood City General Plan that address lraffic and circulation. <br /> • Peer review of TDM Program. Peer review and eval�ate applicaut's TDM program for <br /> compliance with requirements and effectiveness. <br /> 9. :4'oise <br /> a. Issues. "['he project.site's noise environment is primarily influenced by its proximity to local <br /> roadways. Proximity to the San Carlos Airport, the San Prancisco Internatianal Airport, State Route <br /> 92 and �Iigl�way 10l may also contribute to tl�e site's noise environment.Consttuction activities <br /> cauld also result in short-term increases in noise levels and vibration. The proposed land uses within <br /> the praject inc�z.ide se�sitive uses; such as;esidential uses and a proposed elementary school. Locating <br /> sensitive uses in areas with h.i�h noise levels could res�ilt in adverse health and nuisance effects.The <br /> site is adjacent to existing resic3ential development which could be affected by construction noise and <br /> vibratior., and by noise generated by the proposed uses. <br /> b. Approach. LSA will conduct the following subtasks to identify existing noise conditions and <br /> potential impacts that could result from implementation of the proposed project: <br /> • �'�lentify lzaise and land use compatibility criteria. Applicable State of California and Redwood <br /> City noise and land use compatibility criteria will be identified as part of Subtask A-7 and used to <br /> evaluate the significance ofpotential impacts. <br /> • Characterize existing noise. Fxisting sources of noise in the proposed project area, such.as iraffic <br /> and aircraft noise,wili be identified. <br /> • Co�iduct a�nbient noise monitorin�: Short-term ambient noise monitoring will be conducted at <br /> up to four locations within the project site to establish the existing noise environment. <br /> C.',Uxaroen�s;uid S<itiu�\�yxss.u,isi,.f.pca[Scttings'�.TCmporxy 3ntm�a.Ti3u-10LK I3'•.Itevisal Scoyc and E3udY�a��c Conir;ict AnacAmaitdoc 1 0 <br />