AgdaPkt 2007-04-09 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6.1 E Page 19 VROPLISEI) WORK PROGR.4M, SCfIEDU1.E AND BUDGET FOR THE PRSSERVF. A1' RBDW1)OD SHORES � M.�RCH 2O01 union interests), an adjustment in the budget to cover work beyond the assumed level would be needed. Five (S)copics of the Administrative Draft Responses will be provided for City review. 2. Screencheck Responses ta Comments Document After review by City staff and the transmittal of one set of consolidated, non-contradictory comments, LSA will revise the adm.inistrative draft responses and prepare a Screencheck version of the Responses ta Comments Docunzent for final review by City staff. We have allotted time for responding to changes; however, if this task exceeds the cost allotted in the budget,the additional cost would be billed on a time and materials basas.Two(2)copies of the screencheck Final EIR will be provideci for review by Fianning stafi. 3. Responses to Comments Document Upan completion of the Responses to Commenls Document, LSA will provide the City with thirty (30)bound copies. A digital version in portable document format(pdfl would also be created for posting on the City's web site. One digital copy of the Responses to Comments Document will be provided for Planning staff use. TASK I. MITIGATION MONIT4RING AND REPORTING PROGRAM LSA will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Progr.am.We will identify respo��sibility for impiementing and monitoring each mitigation measure, along with monitoring triggers and reporting frequency, subject to approval by City staff.Manitoring will be dovetailed with existing processes of project development and review. An administrative draft M.itigation Monitoring and Reporting I'rogram will be submitted to City staff for review with the administrative draft Responses to Comme�lts Document.The final Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program wilt be included with the Final Responses to Comments Document. TASK K. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS LSA's Project Vlanager wi}] be avaiiable io attend warkins sessions :��it��City staff an�{t�.e�r�;ect team ta gather information,review progzess,arrive at a reasonable range of alternatives,review�re- Iiminary findings,discuss staff comments,affer input into any discussions on project modifications, and assist in poiicy drafting. The proposed cost estixnate includes attendance by both the Principal-in- Charge and Project Manager at the project initiation meeting as detailed under Task A.In addition; we have budgeted(under this task) for attendance at up to fve additional meetings with City staff, and up to six public heari�lgs(three Planning Commission and three City Council). Additzonal meetings can be added to the scope as additional services. TASK L. PROJECT MANAGEMENT David Clore,Principal-in-Charge, and Colette Meunier,Project Manager, will undertake a variety of general project management tasks throughout the EIR preparation period. David will provide input on scope,bud�et,contract negotiation and management, scheduling of the project, and quality assiir- C�.�t]ocumcaLs x9d$CltingS�pa%an6iY4Cal SCLIing5lTanDa�ry InTantt Fi1��OLK13�Rt�iscd SCOpC and iindK 4 a5 CAnp'ofl Af1eClvncnl.doG I 6