My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-04-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-04-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2013 1:05:38 PM
Creation date
4/5/2007 3:09:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
4/9/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1 E <br /> Page 18 <br /> PROPOSED W'OIi1C PROGRAM, SCHF.DUI,F. AND BUDGF.T FOR TH6 PRESERVE a7' RED�4'OOU SHORES <br /> h1ARCti 2007 <br /> • Biblio�.�raphy <br /> • Technical Appendices(as needed) <br /> I'ive(5) printed copies and cme digital copy of the Administrative Draft EIR witl be submitted to tlie <br /> Planning staff.{or rev.iew and comment.LSA can meet with staff, as necessary, to discuss comments <br /> on the Administrative Draft. <br /> 2. Screen�hec[t Draft EIR <br /> F3ased on a sing;e set of c�nsolidated and no�l-contradictary comrnents,LSA wiil revise the Admin- <br /> istrative Draft EIR and prepare a Screencheck Draft#'or final review by I'lanning staf£ We have allc.�t- <br /> ted time for responding to changes; however,if this task exceeds the cost allotted in ihe budget due to <br /> Ci18ii�TGS ]ri the�roject�escripil0li GT i��iY�St.S fOI'2uu1t1057Si analy�is tllai are not neeessary-to prepare <br /> a legalty adequate document,the addi�:ional cost would be billed on a time and materials basis.Two <br /> (2)printed copies of the Screencheck Draft EIR will be provided for review by PIanning staff to <br /> verify Chat all rc:quested changes have been made and all appendix materials,references, aaid finai <br /> graphics are acceptable. <br /> 3. Public Review Draft EIR <br /> Working from a single set vf consolidated and non-contradictory comments to be provided by <br /> Plamling staff,L5A will revise tlle Screench�ck Draft EIR.LSA wi11 provide fifty(50)copies of the <br /> Draft EIR to be distributed to responsible agencies, the pubIic, and the State Clearinghouse. LSA will <br /> be responsible for distribution of the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse as well as State agencies <br /> (as specified by the City}. A digital version in portable document format(pdfl would also be created <br /> fo.r posting on the City's web site. One digital copy of the Draft EIR wilt be provided for Planning <br /> staff use. <br /> TASK H. PREPARE RESPONSES TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT <br /> LSA will prepare a Responses to Comments Document, which wi(1 include copies of comments <br /> received on the Draft E1R during the public comnlent period, and responses to those comments, <br /> including identi�cation of any modifications to the Draft EIR itself. The Response to Comments <br /> Docttment together with the Drafi EIR ti�vi?1 re consiciered the Final EIR. <br /> 1. Adrninistrative Draft Response to Comments Docament <br /> The LSA team will formulate responses will provide to each comment on the Draft E1R, including <br /> review period connments received from the public and agencies. An administrative draft of the <br /> responses will be provided l�ogether with: 1)a list of persons, organizations,and puE�lic agencies <br /> commenting on the Uraft EIR; 2)written commei�ts received and minutes of any public hearing <br /> where verbal comments were received; 3}res��onses to environmental cominents raised in the review <br /> process; and 4}a summary af any necessary text, table or figure changes to the Draft EIR. LSA will <br /> discuss the Uest approach to the responses document with City staff at a meeting following the close <br /> of the cornment period. <br /> Our budget estiinate in Table 3 shows the Ievel of professiox�al effort assumed f'or this task. Should an <br /> unexpectedly large volume of comments be submitted(e.;., an organiz.ed letter-writing carnpaib by <br /> anti-development advocates or a substa�itial package of corn.ments by a law�irm represe;iting labor <br /> Ci�.[?Dwn1�H5 and SGli��gs`d0asfi�d>�\t/x9 SC[tind5lTnnpWary Immitt Fi14�LKt3'tReviscd Scopcund$ndgn x CoaVaa Auedmimt.JnC �� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.