Laserfiche WebLink
-_ __ _ __ __ _ .__----- <br /> q.A -5� <br /> - 4. PARKING IMPACTS � � <br /> The perldng analysis w+as conducbed using Ux same essumptions as the parlong analysis for the approved <br /> r�i�� �ua w nflecr �hsnges m par�ng a«aana ana tm P�B �PP�r resulcmg srom the � <br /> new project description. The enalysis was completed using two altemative sets of inforination about <br /> parldng supply and demand in downtown Redwood City: <br /> ■ Fira�t, the analysis was compleud using the same set of assumptions tbat was used in the analysis of <br /> the aPPro� Pr'ol�, with data iuputs modified to roflect only (1) changes in the project description <br /> and (2) increases to the public parling supply in the downwwn area in the facilities included in the <br /> original EIlt parY�ng inventory. Demand estimates for the EIIi, which are uaed in this approacl4 <br /> were based on parldng surveya conducted in 2000, when the xonomy of Califomia and, awre par- <br /> ticularly, Redwood City was stronger than it is now; as a result, overall demand for parldng spaces <br /> was geater than it is now. The parldng supply inventory for tlris approach included onsteet pazlong <br /> spaces, public lots owned by the City of Redwood City, and public tots owned or controlled by sev <br /> eral other public agencies (e.g., Caltrain and San Mateo County). The supply estiinates are modified <br /> in this analysis W reflect only parldng spaces that have.been added onstreet or in the facilities <br /> included in the original inventory since the earlier study was completed. In this Addendum, this <br /> first analysis is called "Analysfs Using Originsl EIIt Supply and Demand Estimates." T6is <br /> analysis is included in this Appendix in order to provide strict comparability with the original EIIt <br /> analysis: it responds to quertions about what the impacts oJthe project on parking condiriorts in <br /> downtown Redwood Ciry xrould have been if this revised project had been the subject of the EIR <br /> Because bacicgound parlvng demand was greater at that time (2000) than it is now, ttris approach <br /> also provides a conservatively high picture of potential fudm conditions with the project. <br /> _ ■ Second, the analysis was repeated using updated parlring decnand and supply information. The <br /> updated pazldng demand information is based on new parldng surveys, conducud in 2002 to reflect <br /> current conditions in downWwn Redwood City. These s�sveys revealed lower pazldng demand lev- <br /> els than were evident in the 2000 surveys. The updated pazldng supply informarion includes the <br /> spaces that have bern added onstreet or in the facilities included in the original inventory, as in the <br /> first analysis. In this second analysis, the available supply is assumed to include only spaces located <br /> (1) onsh�eet, (2) offstreet in City-owned lots and garages (but not spaces in lots/garages owned by <br /> other public agencies), or (3) included in the proposed project. In this Addendum, this secand <br /> analysis is called "Analysis Using Updated Parking Demand Estimates." <br /> Analvsis Usine Ori¢inal EIR Suualv and Demand Estimates <br /> As noted above, this first analysis of pazldng impacts uses all of the original assumptions and information <br /> used in the onginal EIR pazldng analysis, with one exception: increases in the number of parldng spaees <br /> in locations included in the original inventory are added to the total supply. <br /> Updated Parking Supply <br /> Exisung Spaces in Downtown Redwood Ciry <br /> The existing (2000) pazldng supply in the analysis for the approved project included 1,193 onsh�eet spaces <br /> and 1,525 offstreet public spaces. After 4:00 PM, the offstreet supply increased to 1,605 spaces because <br /> spaces in the city's employee lot and spaces in front of City Hall became available to the public. <br /> Since 2000, the public parldng supply in downtown Redwood City has increased for the following rsa- <br /> sons: <br /> A10 <br />