Laserfiche WebLink
�i�-�z <br /> parked vchicles at 2:00 PM. The revised project is anticipated to nach a peak Friday demand of 1,330 <br /> psrked vehicles at 8:00 PM. The revised projecYs parlonB demand at 2:00 PM is 890 parked vehicles. <br /> �n� • <br /> Friday Rourly ParklaY Demand EstlmaW <br /> �600 _ <br /> U00 <br /> 1200 <br /> S �� �qpp�ovedprqect <br /> � ■ Revised Projat <br /> � B00 <br /> � <br /> � <br /> s` 600 <br /> d <br /> 400 <br /> 200 <br /> j 0 . <br /> �� ��'�P�' �4�' �a�' �,¢�' �e�' �q�' 4�' ¢�' q�' ¢�' a�' a � 4 � <br /> `o . ,�. ,�;. � ti �;. e;� 5 � �;� ,�� �d� q cQ lo cfl , �8 `ry d� e � <br /> '��, Time of Day <br /> The differences in the Friday pazldng demand estimates behveen the approved project and the revised <br /> project result from the removal of the office space from the project. As a result, the pazldng demand of <br /> the revised project is lower by between 100 and 500 vehicles during the day. During the evening, the <br /> major pazking component of both ahematives is the cinema, and the parldng demand differences dimin- <br /> ish. <br /> Parking 7mpacts (Updated AnalysrsJ <br /> Baseline Analvsis: Like the traffic analysis, the baseline pazldng analysis includes pazking demand asso- <br /> ciated with the Fox Theater. <br /> The revised estimates of hourly pazking demands generated by existing downtown uses (from the survey) <br /> plus the parking demands generated by the revised project were added together, and — as in the original <br /> analysis — the results were increased by 10 percent to account for the pazldng vacancy allowance. This <br /> estimate of total future pazidag demand was compazed to the future parldng supply, comprised of (1) <br /> spaces available in City-owned public pazldng supply within the study area plus (2) the spaces provided <br /> by the project. Neither private lots nor the lots/garages operated by other public agencies were included. <br /> The hourly parking demands, pazldng supplies, and the resulting parldng space surpluses/deficits for the <br /> three project altematives aze summariud in Table A14 and illustrated in Figure A6. <br /> A19 <br />