My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Ord07 2309
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Ord07 2309
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2007 11:25:59 AM
Creation date
5/8/2007 3:58:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Ordinance
Date
5/7/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />05/07/2007 <br /> <br />incompleteness. The applicant may resubmit the application in complete form without <br />paying the application fee again, one time, within thirty (30) calendar days of when the <br />notice of incompleteness is given. If the Director fails to provide notice of <br />incompleteness within thirty (30) calendar days, then the application shall be deemed <br />complete. <br /> <br />D. Perfectinq appeal. An appeal of a sign-related decision is effective when <br />delivered to the City Clerk within the required time on a form prescribed by the Director, <br />accompanied by any applicable appeal fee. The fee shall be in the amount set by the <br />City Council. The notice of appeal shall be signed by the appellant, identifying the <br />matter or decision appealed from and stating the grounds of appeal. All notices of <br />appeal on all sign-related decisions must be filed with the City Clerk within seven (7) <br />calendar days of when the appeal right arises. <br /> <br />E. When appeal riqht arises. Unless timeliness of decision is waived by the <br />applicant or appellant, the right to appeal a sign-related decision arises at the earliest of: <br />when written notice of the Director's decision is effective under the "Notice" provision of <br />Section 3.62; when personally delivered or mailed to the applicant; or when an appellate <br />decision is made by vote of the Planning Commission or City Council in a duly noticed <br />public hearing on the matter; or the expiration of the time in which the Director or City <br />Council is required to make a decision. <br /> <br />F. Timeliness of decision; waiver of time. Unless otherwise provided, at each <br />stage of review, all sign-related decisions shall be made within thirty (30) calendar days. <br />This time period begins at the earliest of when the permit application is complete, when <br />the request for interpretation has been received, or when the appeal has been timely <br />and properly filed, as applicable. When any such decision is not made within the <br />required time, and the applicant or appellant does not waive time, then the application <br />or appeal shall be deemed approved and the applicant or appellant shall have the <br />immediate right to appeal to the next level of review. The timeliness requirement may <br />be waived by the applicant or appellant at any stage of the process. <br /> <br />G. Maintenance of status QUO. While any sign-related decision is pending, <br />the status quo shall be maintained until the review or appeal has run its full course, <br />unless the subject sign is in such physical condition that it presents a serious and <br />immediate threat to the public health and safety, in which case it may be abated as a <br />public nuisance, pursuant to applicable law. <br /> <br />H. Hearinq and decision on appeal. When any sign-related decision is timely <br />appealed to the City Council, that body shall hold a duly noticed public hearing on the <br />matter, hear arguments and take evidence and decide the matter within the required <br />time period, unless the applicant or appellant waives time. The decision shall be in <br />writing and shall state facts from the record which support any findings made. <br /> <br />I. Judicial review. Following exhaustion of all available appellate procedures <br />within the City, any applicant may seek juridical review of the City's final decision <br /> <br />Atty/Ord/Ord.211 <br />032007 <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />Ord 2309 <br />formerly Muff # 305 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.