AgdaPkt 2007-06-04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

__ _ __ ___... __ ... _.. _ _ __._ _ _-7A -~~ Page 16 High Density Ranking Rental 438 units pro ected 1 2 2 4 ~ 4 4 4 4 i ! ~ ~ Additions Rankin 5 5 8 6 6 6 6 7~ PRCS staff anticipates recammending that Council take action to establish an in-lieu fee at fhe 80% level and using that figure during the public outreach process described in the "Next Steps" section of this report, below. The $0% levels are shown in Table 5. Table 5: Maximum and 80% MaXi`murn Ailc~wable Park Fee _ Dwellin Units/Acre Low, 1-7 Medium, 8-20 I Hi h, 21 + Addition Maximum Fee $19,995 $96,784 $17,983 $13,189 $17,474 $1,696 80% Maximum Fee 15.996 93,427 74,386 I 10 551 13979 1,357 The proposed draft ordinances being developed by fhe City Attorney's Office for Council consideration speak to exemptions, discounts and credits as follows: Exemptions -- Only residential developments are subject to the proposed lea. Public facilities, schools, commercial and office development would not be affected. Discounts - PRCS staff is not recammending any discounts at this time. The Housing and Human Concerns Committee has put forward a specific formula for discounts with respect to certain affordable housing types which will be forwarded to Council for their consideration. Credits -Residential developers are offered up to a 100% credit far donated land and improvements that meet the City active parkland criteria. Pipeline Projects - It will also be proposed that the fees will apply to all projects which apply far a Tentative Map or a building perm ~ 30 days after the ordinances go into effect which is 60 days after the second reading of the ordinances. Next Steps if the Planning Commission accepts the staff recommendations for the General Plan Amendment and adopts the CEQA Negative Declaration, staff will begin another public outreach process with the specifics of the in-lieu fee ordinances. Staff will present input from that outreach effort and the Planning Commission recommendations to the Council Finance Committee in early May 2007. We expect that the Finance Committees' recommendation to the full Council will take place in June 2007. ENVtRQNMENTAL REVfEW A Negative Declaration was prepared per the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and made available to the public for 21 days (see Attachment 1). As of the writing of this staff report no written comments have been received. The circulation period ran from March 14 -April 3. No environmental impacts are expected as a result of the creation of a park standard and accompanying policy. However, any parks funded by the dedication and in-lieu fee ordinance would be subject to the appropriate site specific environmental review.