Laserfiche WebLink
effective July 29, 2002. The City Council will review the City Attomey's pay for <br /> performance bonus which may be up to ten (10%) pement at a later time. <br /> MINUTE ORDER 02-355 <br /> <br /> 7.2 Section - Resolutions <br /> <br /> A. RESOLUTION 14482 AMENDING SALARY SCHEDULE AND COMPENSATION PLAN <br /> FOR THE POSITION OF CITY CLERK; <br /> <br /> 7.3 Section - Claims and Warrants <br /> <br /> A. Reject the claims of: John Mahoney, claim no. 2058; the claim of Erin Renee <br /> Sefcovic, claim no. 2064; the claim of USANMi-Sook You, claim no. 2065; the <br /> claim of E. Fred Tavemier, claim no. 2066; the claim of Kelly J. Tanalepy, Attorney <br /> at Law, on behalf of various claimants, claim no. 2068; the claim of Darlane <br /> Rogerson, claim no. 2069; and the claim of Justine Jepsen, claim no. 2070; as <br /> submitted; MINUTE ORDER 02-356 <br /> <br /> B. Approve warrants dated through December 2, 2002 and usual and necessary <br /> payments through December 9, 2002; MINUTE ORDER 02-357 <br /> 7.4Section - Ordinances (2nd Reading) <br /> <br /> B. ORDINANCE 2238 AMENDING CHAPTER 2; ARTICLE VII. PURCHASING, SECTIONs <br /> 2.63, 2.65, 2.68.A., 2.72, 2.77 AND 2.80 OF THE REDWOOD CITY MUNICIPAL CODE <br /> (first reading on November 4, 2002); <br /> <br /> C. ORDINANCE 2239 AMENDING CHAPTER 18 LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS AND <br /> PLANNING, SECTIONS 18.235 AND 18.242 OF THE REDWOOD CITY. MUNICIPAL <br /> CODE (first reading on November 18, 2002) (Ordinance Amending Section 18.242 of <br /> the City Code relating to undergrounding of utilities); <br /> <br /> D. ORDINANCE 2240 OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA, ELIMINATING <br /> THE EXISTING TIME LIMIT ON INCURRING DEBT FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT <br /> PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2 (first reading on November 18, 2002); <br /> <br /> 7.4 Section - Ordinances (2nd Reading) - Continued <br /> <br /> A. M/S Ruskin/Hartnett to adopt ORDINANCE 1130-315 AMENDING THE REDWOOD <br /> CITY ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD SECTION 52, PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT <br /> OR P - DISTRICT (first reading on October 28, 2002); <br /> <br /> Council Member Ruskin stated that he did not support the ordinance when <br /> introduced because it was his belief that it would best be applied not city-wide. In <br /> the interim he met with City staff, studied maps in relation to the subject and after <br /> careful consideration, came to the conclusion that it is best applied city-wide. <br /> <br /> The motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote by those present. <br /> <br />REGULAR MEETING (JOINT SESSION) DECEMBER 2, 2002 <br />MINUTES PAGE 4 <br /> <br /> <br />