Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Thomas Passaic <br />April 24, 2008 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Budget Status and Request for Augment <br /> <br />Subsequent to submittal of our proposed scope of work, schedule, and budget to the city the proposed <br />project's path through the city's entitlement process began to evolve, which is the basis of our request for <br />a scope and budget augment. Among the issues that have combined to necessitate the request are: <br /> <br />. The need to conduct multiple site visits (1 was projected) for the original purpose of collecting <br />site for our use (1 conducted), as well as to facilitate the project's understanding by members of <br />the Historic Resources Advisory Committee and city staff (2 were conducted); <br /> <br />. The format for and depth of analysis of the Initial Study expanded significantly from the city's <br />then practiced convention; <br /> <br />. On-going delays in obtaining critical and accurate project information from the applicant; <br /> <br />. The number of in-person and telephone conference calls with city staff and the applicant <br />exceeded the original projection of 3 such meetings or conference calls; <br /> <br />. Review of the applicant commissioned Cultural Resources Evaluation for the proposed project <br />far exceeded original projections, including review of at least three iterations of the evaluation <br />(where one had been expected) and attendance at 2 meetings of the Historic Resources Advisory <br />Committee (where one had been expected); and <br /> <br />. Extensive interaction with the members of the public. <br /> <br />Impact Sciences' projected budget to complete Tasks 1 and 2 was $28,494. Because the added efforts <br />outlined above significantly expanded our original scope of work we reallocated budgets from Tasks 3 <br />through 5 to cover the additional work efforts. <br /> <br />At this juncture we have exceeded the original budget to complete delivery of the Administrative Draft IS <br />to the city due to factors beyond our immediate control, as outlined above. As such, we will require an <br />augment to our original budget estimate to prepare the IS!MND based on pending comments from city <br />staff on the topics of aesthetics and hydrology and water quality, to prepare responses to comments and <br />the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and to manage the project through the city's <br />entitlement process. Our current estimate for that is $12,460, based on the following: <br />