My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-08-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-08-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2007 5:37:52 PM
Creation date
8/9/2007 3:32:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Closed
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/13/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
317
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7A <br />Page 84 <br /> <br />Response to Comments in FEIR Letter F <br /> <br />1. The Notice of Preparation (NOP) is required to provide a description of the <br />project, its location, and probable environmental effects. A description of <br />alternatives is not required for the NOP; however, the City included those that <br />were under consideration at that time. The NOP must be written to provide <br />sufficient information to enable agencies to provide "meaningful responses." The <br />City's NOP met this requirement and the City took into account agency <br />responses to the NOP in preparation of the Draft EIR. The Expanded Warehouse <br />and Alternative Fueling Location alternative was fully described and evaluated in <br />the Draft EIR, which was provided to the same agencies that received the NOP. <br /> <br />2. Issues regarding the alternatives analysis in the Draft EIR are addressed in the <br />staff response to the appeal letter. See Attachment 2 to this staff report. <br /> <br />3. Issues regarding the Costco cumulative traffic analysis and its relationship to the <br />Stanford Outpatient Center Project and the Downtown Precise Plan traffic <br />analyses are discussed in the staff response to the appeal letter. See <br />Attachment 2 to this staff report. <br /> <br />4. The Final EIR (page 3-296) correctly states that most Costco customers will <br />access the site via the new driveway at Willow Street. This response provides <br />additional clarification on the second driveway and Its relationship to queues for <br />the gas station. The second driveway between the proposed Costco building <br />and the SafKeep Storage warehouse is for emergency access, fuel and <br />warehouse deliveries, and some customers who may choose to use this <br />driveway to access or depart the site. With regard to the access drive around <br />the building (including the area between the proposed Costco building and the <br />SafKeep Storage warehouse), this area is for Costco-controlled vehicles only <br />(Le., delivery trucks, etc.) as well as for emergency vehicle access. Customer <br />VehiClesahd.tr'licks .wol.ild.h6tbe .per'mittedtOqUeUeihthatlocati6h. ... As <br />indicated in the Draft EIR (page 4.4-12), the proposed fueling center queue area <br />would be able to accommodate the expected number of vehicles accessing the <br />gas station. Additional queue space for the gas station can be accommodated <br />on the SamTrans lease parcel. <br /> <br />5. The City's traffic consultant, Fehr & Peers, has prepared a technical <br />memorandum addressing how vehicles are distributed on Willow Street and <br />Stambaugh Street. This memorandum is attached. <br /> <br />6. The primary purpose of emergency vehicle preemption at traffic signals is to <br />enable emergency vehicles to maneuver through traffic quickly and efficiently, <br />regardless of the underlying traffic conditions. The traffic analysis for the <br />proposed project indicates that "gridlock" conditions would not occur; in fact, <br />traffic movement along Middlefield Road is anticipated to improve with the new <br />signal at Willow Street and increased queuing capacity at the left turn pocket to <br />Woodside Road. If emergency vehicles encounter severe traffic congestion <br />during an emergency and render emergency vehicle preemption less effective, <br />the vehicles can use alternate routes, additional response units can be <br />dispatched via routes that are unimpeded by gridlock conditions, and emergency <br />vehicles can use bicycle lanes or emergency shoulders for travel lanes. In <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.