My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-06-10 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-06-10 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 10:15:24 AM
Creation date
6/6/2019 4:04:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/10/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
739
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(0,1D.I q (su-neI Mc,,_'hd <br />Responses to question asked Jun 6, 2019. <br />Question asked in the form of "From 1 (strongly oppose) to 5 (strongly support), how much do you support the following statement?" <br />I amok with Chick-fil-A opening anew restaurant on Whipple Ave. <br />3 <br />O 50 100 150 200 250 300 we 400 450 <br />Total responses: 1025 <br />People in support: 435 <br />People in opposition: 474 <br />Neutral/don't know: 116 <br />Comments <br />In support: <br />�5=nlaOgrymcpoM1 <br />34sutr lryntk <br />. =m.auViVtbnknory <br />■z=geoeraryoopose <br />■i=morrgNogoose <br />aha 4.1 won't be a customer. But no, this is too much. Attempting to prevent a food retailer from setting up shop because we don't agree with the owner's <br />views? Where does it end? No Apple Stores allowed in Dallas because Tim Cook is gay? <br />49 5 -Anyone who is wanting to open a business that isn't violating any laws should not be restricted from doing so. Customers are free to use or not use a <br />business and even protest or not protest it. Prohibiting private citizens from using their property when it meets legal requirements is awful. Besides their <br />sandwiches are tasty! <br />+39 Syessss!!! I love chik-Fil-a, and we should not exclude businessjust because they don't align with our own views on sexuality. It is up to the consumer if <br />they do not wish to patronise a specific business because of their company values, but this should not impact others with no strong feelings on this matter. <br />More business coming in is good for the economy of the city <br />E2 S. People who disagree with Chik-fil-a should vote with there wallets. <br />+za 51t's a great restaurant that will provide food variety to the area. Corporate philosophy has little bearing here on their ability to provide food/service. <br />.la S YES YES YES. OMG We all want Chick-fil-A here. We should be a community tolerant of a diversity of beliefs! And we need more affordable, tasty food <br />options in <br />«te S Keep politics out of business! They have great food and have done amazing things for the communities they are a part of. Ifyou don't like ANY business's <br />stance on anything you don't have to spend your money there. <br />a16 5 -.Strongly agree!!! There should be NO political litmus test for food establishments moving into our cities. Their chicken is great. Ifyou don't like the <br />Corporation, dont eat there. Do not invoke your non-inclusive values on our community!!! <br />04 S. As long as the store fronts are not discriminatory, there's no reason to bar them from operating their business. For example, In and Out prints religious <br />quotes on their packaging and they aren't barred from operating. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.