My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res96 12834
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Res96 12834
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:39:39 PM
Creation date
12/16/2002 10:10:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/29/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Shores. The pattern altitude in either case is 800 feet MSL, and the building <br /> location would have no effect. <br /> <br /> (c) Radar data from the San Francisco International Airport PASSUR system <br /> for runway 30 operations during fair weather show that the majority of downwind <br /> operations take place in a band 3,000 to 5,500 feet abeam the runway. Runway <br /> 12 operations under inclement weather generally take place in a band of from <br /> 2,500 to 5,500 feet abeam the runway, and at altitudes of from 500 to 700 feet. <br /> Under these conditions, the location and height of the building would have no <br /> effect whatsoever on the location of the traffic pattern or noise abatement <br /> procedures. <br /> <br />3.10.17 Potential Effect: The existence of the 10-story building on the Project site could <br /> be responsible for aimraft accidents during emergency situations, such as an <br /> engine-out situation. <br /> <br /> Findings: The GID hereby makes finding (1). <br /> <br /> Facts in Support of Findings: <br /> <br /> (a) The first rule for maintaining control of an aircraft in an engine-out situation is <br /> to maintain lateral and directional control. The 10-story building is located <br /> approximately 5,200 feet from the start of takeoff roll and 1,800 feet to the fight of the <br /> extended centerline for Runway 30. The building would not represent a hazard unless <br /> the pilot had lost ail lateral and directional control, in which case the aircraft would <br /> likely invert and crash anyway. <br /> <br /> (b) Up to a 1 O-degree fight mm under engine-out conditions would allow the <br /> aircraft in distress several options preferable to overflying the Project site. These <br /> alternatives include: <br /> <br /> 1. To land straight ahead in the area designated "Clear Zone" on Exhibit 19 <br /> of the Airport Study (the purpose for which the Clear Zone was designed); <br /> <br /> 2. To maintain straight and level flight on the runway heading into the 50- <br /> foot height restriction corridor, which was developed specifically for this <br /> purpose; or <br /> <br /> 3. To enter the 50-foot height restriction corridor on a heading of up to ten <br /> degrees offthe runway heading, and continue the flight unobstructed. <br /> <br /> Any of these alternatives would be preferable to making a turn in excess of 20 degrees <br /> in the direction of the Project site. <br /> <br /> -34- <br />GIDEIRFD.DOC <br />7/23/96 5:44 PM <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.