My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res96 12819
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Res96 12819
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:38:19 PM
Creation date
12/16/2002 10:22:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
City Council
Date
7/15/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the afternoon peak hour. It also concludes that Project traffic will contribute to <br /> the following cumulative impacts: <br /> <br /> (1) Intersection impact at Redwood Shores Parkway/Twin Dolphin <br /> Drive (morning and afternoon peak hours); <br /> <br /> (2) Intersection impact at Redwood Shores Parkway/Bridge Parkway <br /> (morning peak hour); and <br /> <br /> Chanson' fram l.O.q D tn I.Og E in the afternoon peak hour at the <br /> westbound to southbound loop off-ramp at the Highway i 0 i/'Redwood <br /> Shores Parkway interchange. <br /> <br /> (c) The Project Traffic Study further identifies mitigation measures that will <br /> reduce all of these impacts. Impact (1) can be mitigated by widening Redwood Shores <br /> Parkway to accommodate three through lanes in each direction through the <br /> intersection. Impact (2) can be mitigated by the reconfiguration of southbound Bridge <br /> Parkway to accommodate two right turn lanes and a shared through-left lane, and <br /> through the addition of a second eastbound left tm lane on Redwood Shores Parkway. <br /> Impact (3) can be mitigated through modifications to the interchange, including <br /> conversion from a full to partial cloverleaf design and construction of the Measure A- <br /> funded auxiliary lanes. All of these mitigation measures were previously identified by <br /> the Crain Report as needed improvements. <br /> <br /> (d) The Project is only one of many sources that will contribute to the <br /> identified traffic impacts. Because these impacts are cumulative, the Project is not <br /> responsible for the total cost of mitigation. Rather, it is responsible for <br /> contributing to cumulative mitigation measures. Therefore, the applicant shall be <br /> required to participate in a Traffic Assessment District for the Redwood Shores <br /> area in order to pay for its fair share of the identified improvements. The <br /> applicant also is required to pay a Facilities Fee, which will contribute to <br /> improvements made by the General Improvement District. These mitigation <br /> measure will be enforced through the Planned Development Permit and through <br /> the Development Agreement. The Development Agreement further provides that <br /> the City may require Flatirons to dedicate or offer for dedication the right-of-way <br /> necessary to provide left and right mm lanes into the Project from Redwood <br /> Shores Parkway, as well as one through lane <br /> <br /> (e) The Project applicant will also undertake additional measures to improve <br /> traffic circulation and reduce congestion. Shoreline Drive will be extended, a <br /> long-needed improvement that will improve traffic circulation within Redwood <br /> Shores. The Facilities Fee will be used for offsite improvements, including all <br /> necessary offsite traffic signals, public roadways and roadway improvements. <br /> The Facilities Fee is described in detail in the Development Agreement. <br /> <br /> -7- <br />EAFNDGCC.DOC <br />7/11/96 9:56 AM <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.