Laserfiche WebLink
a general aviation airport and of safety issues associated with a general aviation airport. <br /> ... {T]he scope, the detail, the methodology, their references to applicable statutes and <br /> regulations and techniques is very accurate and quite professional." (Reporter's <br /> Transcript of Proceedings, Redwood City Planning Commission, June 19, 1996, p. <br /> 363.) <br /> <br /> (g) The FAA is responsible for administering Part 77 of the Federal Aviation <br /> Regulations (FAR Part 77). The FAA's objective is to "ensure the safety of aircraft <br /> and the efficient use of navigable airspace by the aircraft." (FAA, Advisory Circular <br /> 70/74~0-2!, "Pmpv~d Ce::~tv_.;tlc.:: er A!t--~?-tien of Objects that May Aff~t the <br /> Navigable Airspace," p. 2.) Pursuant to Subpart B of FAR Part 77, the Project was <br /> required to submit FAA Form 7460-1, "Notice of Proposed Construction or <br /> Alteration," to the manager of the regional FAA Air Traffic Division. The FAA then <br /> conducted an aeronautical study of the Project's potential effects, including the "extent <br /> of [any] adverse physical or electromagnetic interference effect upon the navigable <br /> airspace or air navigation facilities." (FAA Order 7400.2C, "Procedures for Handling <br /> Airspace Matters.") <br /> <br /> (h) On June 17, 1996, prior to the last two Planning Commission hearings on <br /> the Project, the FAA issued its determination. The FAA stated as follows: "The <br /> airspace evaluation concludes the proposal would not have a substantial adverse <br /> effect on the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace by the aircraft and <br /> would not be a ha?ard to air navigation." (FAA, Airspace and Procedures, AWP- <br /> 530, "Acknowledgment of Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration," 96- <br /> AWP-1042-OE ("FAA Finding"), p. 3.) <br /> <br /> (i) In a letter to the City dated February 26, 1996, the President of the San Carlos <br /> Airport Pilots' Association states as follows: "Pilots from our organization and <br /> Airport Staff have consistently stated that the height of this building creates a public <br /> safety hazard. The developer and his representatives have claimed that no bayard <br /> exists .... It would seem that the final and most appropriate arbiters of these <br /> conflicting claims would be the Federal Aviation Administration who have established <br /> the 7460-1 form for.lust this purpose." (Emphasis added.) The FAA process has <br /> determined that the Project would not create a hazard to aviation. <br /> <br /> (j) In 1983, Redwood Shores, Inc. voluntarily reduced heights of buildings within <br /> two flight corridors at San Carlos Airport to 50 feet above ground level (60 feet MSL). <br /> The flight corridors are incorporated into the City's General Plan. The Project does <br /> not conflict with the flight corridors. <br /> <br /> (k) With the approval of the Planned Development Permit, the Project is consistent <br /> with the Commemial Park zoning on the site. The heights of all of the Project <br /> buildings, including the 7, 8 and 10 story buildings, are in conformance with the Safety <br /> Element of the City's General Plan, which allows building heights of up to 150 feet <br /> <br /> -13- <br /> <br />£AFIqDGCCDOC <br />7/11/96 9:56 AM <br /> <br /> <br />