Laserfiche WebLink
Planned Development Permit (PDP). The issuance ofa PDP is consistent with <br /> Redwood City zoning policies and does not constitute a variance from such <br /> policies. As an example, the Oracle project on Marine Parkway was granted a <br /> PDP for building heights of from 120 to 222 feet MSL. <br /> <br /> (b) The City has adopted the obstruction clearance criteria set forth in FAR <br /> Part 77, Subpart C, "Civil Airport Imaginary Surfaces," as the ultimate structural <br /> height limitation in the vicinity of San Carlos Airport. These height criteria have <br /> also been adopted by county, state and federal governments. The Federal <br /> Av,_'afion Ada~_L~J. str. at.i~n ("F A~,") ha~ dc'~'c.l~r~:) "A Mod~I 7tm jag (3rd[n_ance t~ <br /> limit height of objects around airports." This model zoning ordinance is also <br /> based on the obstruction surfaces described in FAR Part 77, Subpart C. Similarly, <br /> the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook prepared for Caltrans states that <br /> "limiting the heights of structures to the heights indicated by the part 77 surfaces <br /> provides an ample margin of safety for normal aircraft operations.'~ <br /> <br /> (c) The Project, including the I O-story building at 151 feet MSL, will not <br /> penetrate the imaginary surface imposed by FAR Part 77, Subpart C. Therefore, it <br /> complies fully with all applicable zoning and other state and federal safety <br /> policies. <br /> <br />3.10.2 P_o.l.eJlliaLF. J~e~: The 151-foot height of the ten-story office building in its <br /> proposed location could create an air traffic conflict with aircraft using a short <br /> final approach to runway 12. This approach is often favored in inclement weather <br /> when visibility is impaired, and aircraft using this approach could likewise be <br /> exposed to a collision ha?ard. The San Carlos Airport is used to train students <br /> how to make short approaches, and the Project would prevent this training from <br /> taking place. The addition of two more buildings over 100 feet in height could <br /> serve to compound this situation. <br /> <br />F_i.!l.0Jagl: The City hereby makes finding (1). <br /> Facts in Sup_non of Findings: <br /> <br /> (a) Under special Visual Flight Rule ("SVFR") conditions, including reduced <br /> visibility and a low ceiling, either flight visibility or ground visibility must be at <br /> least one statute mile. Even if it is possible, in theory, that an aircraft could <br /> approach Runway 12 at an altitude so low that the 10-story building could <br /> represent an operational constraint, the ground or flight visibility requirement of <br /> at least one statute mile would be applicable, and the aircraft would have ample <br /> opportunity to see and avoid the structure. <br /> <br /> (b) During the period December 1995 through February 1996, the San <br /> Francisco Bay area experienced some of its most severe winter weather in many <br /> years. On several days during this period, Runway 12 at San Carlos Airport was <br /> -21- <br /> EAFNDGCCDOC <br /> 7/11/96 9:56 AM <br /> <br /> <br />