My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res11 15086
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res11 15086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:45:33 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:45:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
1/24/2011
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
01/24/2011 <br /> Exhibit B <br /> increase represents a potentially significant cumulative impact, because <br /> implementing Mitigation Measure 9 -2 would conflict with the City's PED <br /> policies, and because the improvements required by this mitigation measure are <br /> not within the City's jurisdiction, this mitigation measure is deemed infeasible, <br /> and this impact is deemed to be significant and unavoidable. <br /> (ii) Remaining Impacts. Because there are no feasible mitigation <br /> measures available to mitigate the significant impact identified above, this impact <br /> is considered significant and unavoidable. <br /> (iii) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, social, <br /> economic and other benefits of the DPP override the significant adverse impacts <br /> of the DPP relating to the cumulative traffic impacts described above, as set forth <br /> in the Statement of Overriding Considerations below. <br /> Impact 9 -12: Cumulative Impact on Main Street/Woodside Road <br /> Westbound Ramps Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project Conditions during <br /> both the AM and PM peak hour, this intersection would continue to operate at an <br /> unacceptable LOS F. The additional project traffic would cause the critical delay to <br /> increase by more than five (5) seconds, plus the peak hour signal warrant. <br /> a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed <br /> on pages 9 -58 to 9 -64 of the DEIR. <br /> b) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City, the <br /> City Council finds that: <br /> (i) Mitigation Measures. Mitigation of this project impact could be <br /> achieved by Mitigation Measure 9 -3 as discussed under Impact 9 -3, above. <br /> However, as noted above, the improvements proposed by Mitigation Measure 9 -3 <br /> are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of Caltrans, and can and should be <br /> adopted by Caltrans. Because implementation of this mitigation measure is <br /> outside of the City's jurisdiction, it is deemed infeasible and therefore this impact <br /> is deemed to be significant and unavoidable. <br /> (ii) Remaining Impacts. Because there are no feasible mitigation <br /> measures available to mitigate the significant impact identified above, this impact <br /> is considered significant and unavoidable. <br /> (iii) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, social, <br /> economic and other benefits of the DPP override the significant adverse impacts <br /> of the DPP relating to the cumulative traffic impacts described above, as set forth <br /> in the Statement of Overriding Considerations below. <br /> U: \Resolutions\2011\Reso 15086 Exhibit B.doc 31 <br /> 012011 Reso. # 15086 <br /> Muff #601 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.