My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res11 15086
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res11 15086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:45:33 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:45:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
1/24/2011
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
01/24/2011 <br /> Exhibit B <br /> Impact 9 -13: Cumulative Impact on Middlefield Road/Jefferson Avenue <br /> Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project Conditions during the PM peak hour, <br /> this intersection would degrade from LOS E to LOS F. The additional project <br /> traffic would cause the critical delay to increase by more than five (5) seconds. <br /> a) Potential Impact. The impact identified above is described and discussed <br /> on pages 9 -58 to 9 -64 of the DEIR. <br /> b) Findings. Based on the FEIR and the entire record before the City, the <br /> City Council finds that: <br /> (i) Mitigation Measures. Mitigation of the project contribution <br /> to this cumulative impact could be achieved through Mitigation Measure 9 -13 <br /> (pages 9 -67 to 9 -68 of the DEIR) which would require the restriping of the <br /> southbound approach of Middlefield Road to provide one through lane and one <br /> right turn lane, and prohibit southbound left turns (from Middlefield Road to <br /> Jefferson Avenue, towards Broadway). With this improvement, the intersection <br /> would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS, but the change in the critical <br /> delay from Cumulative Without Project Conditions would be reduced to less than <br /> five (5) seconds, a less than significant level. However, these improvements <br /> would conflict with newly adopted PED policies contained in the City's New <br /> General Plan. PED policies are intended to promote alternative modes of <br /> transportation in the DPP area, emphasizing pedestrian and bicycle travel and a <br /> reduction in the number of vehicle miles traveled within and by residents of the <br /> City. The PED policies do so by, among other things, slowing traffic and <br /> enhancing pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure to ensure that the City's DPP <br /> street network facilitates safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle travel. The <br /> improvements would conflict with these policies by impeding pedestrian mobility. <br /> In addition, as explained above, the New General Plan contains additional policies <br /> and programs pursuant to which the City will no longer rely on specific LOS <br /> measurements to determine the significance of a project's potential traffic impacts <br /> in the downtown area, and pursuant to these new LOS Policies and programs, this <br /> potential cumulative impact could be considered less than significant. Assuming, <br /> however, that this identified traffic increase represents a potentially significant <br /> cumulative impact, because implementing Mitigation Measure 9 -13 would <br /> conflict with the City's PED policies, this measure is deemed infeasible, and this <br /> impact is deemed to be significant and unavoidable. <br /> (ii) Remaining Impacts. Because there are no feasible mitigation <br /> measures available to mitigate the significant impact identified above, this impact <br /> is considered significant and unavoidable. <br /> (iii) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, social, <br /> economic and other benefits of the DPP override the significant adverse impacts <br /> of the DPP relating to the cumulative traffic impacts described above, as set forth <br /> in the Statement of Overriding Considerations below. <br /> U:\Resolutions\2011\Reso 15086 Exhibit B.doc 32 <br /> 012011 Reso. # 15086 <br /> Muff #601 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.