Laserfiche WebLink
12/03/2012 <br />October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake with a magnitude of 7.1 on the Richter scale and an <br />epicenter near Santa Cruz, approximately 50 miles south of the City. <br />On January 28, 2011, the City's Engineer received a letter from the Risk Analysis Branch <br />Chief of the Mitigation Division. of the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency <br />Management Agency ("FEMA") indicating that, based on information provided by the City <br />regarding its levee system and other pertinent reports and studies, the Redwood Shores area of <br />the City, which includes the Taxable Parcels in the District, is witivn a FEMA one (1) percent <br />annual -chance (base) flood area. FEMA cautions in the letter, however, that flood risk in the <br />area still exists, and that levee systems and the estimated level of protection provided by such <br />systems can and do change with time, and that future FEMA flood reap updates may require <br />that the relevant levee system be certified again at the time of update. FEMA also notes in the <br />letter that levee systems require regular maintenance and can be overtopped or fail in large <br />flood events. On October 17, 2012, in a letter to the Mayor of the City, FEMA revalidated the <br />determinations made in its prior January 28, 2011 letter. <br />An earthquake, flood or one or more of the other conditions described in the third <br />preceding paragraph may occur and may cause damage to public and private improvements <br />on parcels in the District of varying seriousness, and any such damage may entail significant <br />repair or replacement costs (or such repair or replacement may never occur either because of <br />the cost or because repair or replacement will not facilitate usability or because other <br />considerations may preclude such repair or replacement). Consequently, the occurrence of any <br />of these conditions could result in a significant decrease in the market value of the Taxable <br />Parcels or in such property becoming unusable or unmarketable. <br />Hazardous Substances <br />The presence of hazardous substances on a parcel may result in a reduction in the <br />value of a Taxable Parcel. In general, the owners and operators of a parcel may be required by <br />law to remedy conditions of the parcel relating to releases or threatened releases of hazardous <br />substances. The Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability <br />Act of 1980, sometimes referred to as "CERCLA" or the "Superfund Act," is the most well- <br />known and widely applicable of these laws, but California laws with regard to hazardous <br />substances are also stringent and similar. Under many of these laws, the owner or operator is <br />obligated to remedy a hazardous substance condition of property whether or not the owner or <br />operator has anything to do with creating or handling the hazardous substance. The effect, <br />therefore, should any of the Taxable Parcels be affected by a hazardous substance, is to reduce <br />the marketability and value of the applicable parcel by the costs of remedying the condition, <br />because the purchaser, upon becoming owner, will become obligated to remedy the condition <br />just as is the seller. <br />The City has not independently verified, but is not aware of, the presence of any <br />hazardous substances within the District. <br />Disclosure to Future Purchasers <br />The willingness or ability of an owner of a parcel to pay the Special Tax, even if the <br />value of the property is sufficient to justify payment, may be affected by whether or not the <br />owner was given due notice of the Special Tax authorization at the time the owner purchased <br />the parcel, was informed of the amount of the Special Tax on the parcel should the Special Tax <br />be levied at the maximum tax rate and, at the time of such a levy, has the ability to pay it as <br />well. as pay other expenses and obligations. The City has caused a notice of the Special Tax to <br />be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. Although title companies normally refer to <br />-36- <br />44 RESO. # 15237 <br />MUFF # 505 <br />