My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res12 15237
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res12 15237
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:48:25 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:48:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
12/3/2012
Description
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX BONDS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 99-1 (SHORES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT) OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, APPROVING THE FORM OF AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENT, ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS, A CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT AND A BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, APPROVING THE FORM OF AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT, APPROVING SALE OF BONDS, AND APPROVING OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS AND ACTIONS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
12/03/2012 <br />such notices in title reports, there can be no guarantee that such reference will be made or, if <br />made, that a prospective purchaser or lender will consider such Special Tax obligation when <br />purchasing a property within the District or lending money thereon, as applicable. <br />California Civil Code Section 1102.6b requires that, in the case of transfers, the seller <br />must at least make a good faith effort to notify the prospective purchaser of the special tax <br />lien in a format prescribed by statute. Failure by an owner of a Taxable Parcel to comply with <br />the above requirements, or failure by a purchaser to consider or understand the nature and <br />existence of the Special Tax, could adversely affect the willingness and ability of the purchaser <br />to pay the Special Tax when due. <br />FDIC/Federal Government Interests in Properties <br />General. The ability of the City to foreclose the lien of delinquent unpaid Special Tax <br />installments may be limited with regard to properties in which the Federal Deposit Insurance <br />Corporation (the "FDIC"), the Drug Enforcement Agency, the Internal Revenue Service, or <br />other federal agency has or obtains an interest. <br />Federal courts have held that, based on the supremacy clause of the United States <br />Constitution, in the absence of Congressional intent to the contrary, a state or local agency <br />cannot foreclose to collect delinquent taxes or assessments if foreclosure would impair the <br />federal government interest. This means that, unless Congress has otherwise provided, if a <br />federal governmental entity owns a Taxable Parcel within the District but does not pay taxes <br />and assessments levied on the parcel (including Special Taxes), the applicable state and local <br />governments cannot foreclose on the parcel to collect the delinquent taxes and assessments. <br />Moreover, unless Congress has otherwise provided, if the federal government has a <br />mortgage interest in the parcel and the District wishes to foreclose on the parcel as a result of <br />delinquent Special Taxes, the property cannot be sold at a foreclosure sale unless it can be sold <br />for an amount sufficient to pay delinquent taxes and assessments on a parity, with the Special <br />Taxes and preserve the federal government's mortgage interest. In Rust v. Johnson (9th <br />Circuit, 1.979) 597 F.2d 174, the United States Court of Appeal, Ninth Circuit held that the <br />Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") is a federal instrumentality for purposes of <br />this doctrine, and not a private entity, and that, as a result, an exercise of state power over a <br />mortgage interest held by FNMA constitutes an exercise of state power over property of the <br />United States. <br />The City has not undertaken to determine whether any federal governmental entity <br />currently has, or is likely to acquire, any interest (including a mortgage interest) in any of the <br />Taxable Parcels, and therefore expresses no view concerning the likelihood that the risks <br />described above will materialize while the Bonds are outstanding. <br />FDIC. In the event that any financial institution making any loan which is secured by a <br />lien on a Taxable Parcel within the District is taken over by the FDIC, and prior thereto or <br />thereafter the loan or loans go into default, resulting in ownership of the property by the FDIC, <br />then the ability of the District to collect interest and penalties specified by State law and to <br />foreclose the lien of delinquent unpaid Special Taxes may be limited. <br />The FDIC's policy statement regarding the payment of state and local real property <br />taxes (the "Policy Statement") provides that property owned by the FDIC is subject to state <br />and local real property taxes only if those taxes are assessed according to the property's value, <br />and that the FDIC is immune from real property taxes assessed on any basis other than <br />property value. According to the Policy Statement, the FDIC will pay its property tax <br />-37- <br />45 RESO. # 15237 <br />MUFF # 505 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.