Laserfiche WebLink
APPENDIX D <br />FORM OF OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL <br />[Bond Closing Date] <br />[Addressees] <br />12/03/2012 <br />Re: $ City of Redwood City Redwood Shores Community Facilities District <br />No. 99-1 (Shores Transportation Improvement Project) of the City of Redwood City, <br />Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 <br />Ladies and Gentlemen: <br />We have acted as bond counsel to the City of Redwood City (the "City") in connection with <br />the issuance by the City of its $ City of Redwood City Redwood Shores Community <br />Facilities District No. 99-1 (Shores Transportation Improvement Project) of the City of Redwood <br />City, Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 (the "'Bonds"), on behalf of Redwood Shores <br />Community Facilities District No. 99-1 (Shores Transportation Improvement Project) of the City of <br />Redwood City (the "District"). The Bonds are being issued pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community <br />Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (Section 53311 et seq., of the California Government Code) (the <br />"Act"), a Fiscal Agent Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2013 (the "Fiscal Agent Agreement"), <br />between the City on behalf of the District and C.S. Bank National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"). <br />We have examined the law and such certified proceedings and other documents as we deem <br />necessary to render this opinion. Capitalized undefined terms used herein have the meanings <br />ascribed thereto in the Fiscal Agent Agreement. <br />As Bond Counsel we have examined copies certified to us as being true and complete copies <br />of the proceedings of the City and in connection with the authorization and sale of the Bonds. Our <br />services as Bond Counsel were limited to an examination of the transcript of such proceedings and <br />to rendering the opinions set forth herein. In this connection, we have also examined such other <br />documents, opinions and instruments as we have deemed necessary in order to render the opinions <br />expressed herein. In such examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures on <br />original documents (other than signatures of the City) and the conformity to the original documents <br />of all copies submitted to us. We have also assumed the due execution and delivery of all documents <br />(other than with respect to the City) which we have examined where due execution and delivery are <br />a prerequisite to the effectiveness thereof. As to the various questions of fact material to our opinion, <br />we have relied upon statements or certificates of officers and representatives of the City, public <br />officials and others. <br />On the basis of the foregoing examination and assumptions and in reliance thereon and on <br />all such other matters of fact as we deemed relevant under the circumstances, and upon <br />consideration of the applicable law, we are of the opinion that: <br />1. The City is duly created and validly existing as a public body, corporate and politic, with <br />the power to adopt the resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds, enter into the Fiscal Agent <br />Agreement and perform the agreements on its part contained therein and issue the Bonds. <br />2. The Bonds have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the City and are valid <br />and binding limited obligations of the City, payable solely from the sources provided therefore in <br />the Fiscal Agent Agreement. <br />D-1 <br />69 RESO. # 15237 <br />MUFF # 505 <br />