My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15294
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE STANFORD IN REDWOOD CITY PRECISE PLAN; ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
09/09/2013 <br /> The widening of Woodside Road, inclusive of this intersection, is included in the <br /> City's Traffic Impact Fee Program (TIF) project list. However, there is no current <br /> design option that is acceptable to both Caltrans and the City of Redwood City; <br /> therefore, this improvement may be infeasible. <br /> Finding: If a design for widening Woodside Road can be developed which is acceptable to <br /> both Caltrans and the City of Redwood City, payment of the Traffic Impact Fee <br /> by the applicant would mitigate the proposed project's contribution to the <br /> significant cumulative impact to a less-than-significant level. If it is determined <br /> that the Woodside Road improvements remain infeasible because the <br /> improvements are not consistent with the New Redwood City General Plan <br /> and/or Caltrans policy, the cumulative impact would remain signi�cant and <br /> unavoidable, as would the proposed project's contribution to that cumulative <br /> impact. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 7-14 would reduce the projecYs <br /> contribution to the cumulative traffic impact at the Woodside Road/Middlefield <br /> Road intersection to a less-than-significant level through the project's payment of <br /> its City Traffic Impact Fee to add a southbound (Woodside Road) through lane, <br /> as well as possible crosswalks and pedestrian signals per the City's General <br /> Plan, and other multimodal improvements per Caltrans directives. However, the <br /> City and Caltrans have not agreed on a design option for widening Woodside <br /> Road, so the impact is currently considered significant and unavoidable. These <br /> facts are described in Draft EIR chapter 7 (Transportation, Circulation, and <br /> Parking) on pages 7-1 through 7-70, Draft EIR appendix 21.3 (Supplemental <br /> Transportation Information), and Final EIR appendix A (Supplemental Traffic <br /> Information), which are hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> Impact: Impact 7-15: Cumulative With Project Impact on Douglas Avenue/Bay Road <br /> Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project conditions during the PM peak <br /> hour, the intersection would degrade from LOS C to LOS F, and the proposed <br /> project could contribute up to 78.2 seconds of critical delay to the intersection. <br /> Mitigation: Mitigation 7-15. To mitigate the significant cumulative impact at the intersection <br /> of Douglas Avenue and Bay Road, the intersection would need to be signalized <br /> with protected phasing on the eastbound and westbound approaches on Bay <br /> Road. In addition to signalization, both the eastbound and westbound <br /> approaches would need to be restriped to include a total of one left-turn lane and <br /> one shared through/right-turn lane on both the eastbound and westbound <br /> approaches. With these improvements, the level of service (LOS) at this <br /> intersection would improve to acceptable LOS C during the PM peak hour. <br /> ATTY/RES0.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION RESO.#15294 <br /> REV:09-10-13 VR MUFF#100 <br /> Page 37 of 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.