My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15294
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE STANFORD IN REDWOOD CITY PRECISE PLAN; ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
09/09/2013 <br /> Traffic from the proposed project could add up to 78.2 seconds to the PM peak <br /> hour delay at this intersection over Cumulative No Project conditions (see Draft <br /> EIR Table 7.16); other Cumulative growth could add up to 11.9 seconds to the <br /> delay over Near Term No Project conditions. The proposed project would <br /> contribute its fair share to a mitigation fund established to pay for the cost of this <br /> improvement (estimated, based on the Draft EIR, to be 87 percent) at the time of <br /> issuance of a building permit or, if the City adds the improvement to its Traffic <br /> Impact Fee Program (TIF) project list, the proposed project would pay its Traffic <br /> Impact Fee in effect at time of payment and issuance of a building permit. <br /> Finding: The proposed project's payment of its fair share toward the necessary <br /> improvements identified in Mitigation 7-15 would mitigate the project's <br /> contribution to the cumulative impact to a less-than-significant level. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 7-15 would reduce the project's <br /> contribution to the cumulative traffic impact at the Douglas Avenue/Bay Road <br /> intersection to a less-than-significant level through the projecYs payment of its <br /> fair share (estimated to be 87 percent) to a mitigation fund, or if in effect at <br /> building permit issuance, through payment of its City Traffic Impact Fee, to <br /> signalize and restripe the intersection. These facts are described in Draft EIR <br /> chapter 7 (Transportation, Circulation, and Parking) on pages 7-1 through 7-70, <br /> Draft EIR appendix 21.3 (Supplemental Transportation Information), and Final <br /> EIR appendix A (Supplemental Traffic Information), which are hereby <br /> incorporated by reference. <br /> Impact: Impact 7-16: Cumulative With Project Impact on Douglas Avenue/ <br /> Middlefield Road Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project conditions <br /> during the AM peak hour, the intersection would degrade from LOS D to LOS E, <br /> and the proposed project could contribute up to 10.6 seconds of critical delay to <br /> the intersection. <br /> Mitigation: Mitigation 7-16. To mitigate the cumulative impact at the intersection of Douglas <br /> Avenue and Middlefield Road, the eastbound and westbound approaches would <br /> need to be modified from permitted phasing to protected phasing. (Douglas <br /> Avenue is considered north-south and Middlefield Road is considered east-west.) <br /> With these improvements, the level of service (LOS) at this intersection would <br /> improve to acceptable LOS D during the AM peak hour. <br /> Traffic from the proposed project could add up to 10.6 seconds to the AM peak <br /> hour delay at this intersection over Cumulative No Project conditions (see Draft <br /> EIR Table 7.16); other Cumulative growth could add up to 35.8 seconds to the <br /> delay over Near Term No Project conditions. The proposed project would <br /> contribute its fair share to a mitigation fund established to pay for the cost of this <br /> improvement (estimated, based on the Draft EIR, to be 23 percent) at the time of <br /> issuance of a building permit or, if the City adds the improvement to its Traffic <br /> Impact Fee Program (TIF) project list, the proposed project would pay its Traffic <br /> Impact Fee in effect at time of payment and issuance of a building permit. <br /> ATTY/RES0.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION RESO.#15294 <br /> REV:09-10-13 VR MUFF#100 <br /> Page 38 of 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.