My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15294
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE STANFORD IN REDWOOD CITY PRECISE PLAN; ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
09/09/2013 <br /> C. Noise Impact: <br /> 1. Impact 13-2: Project-Facilitated Construction Noise <br /> WHEREAS, the DEIR's Cultural and Historical Resources Chapter analysis <br /> (Impact/Mitigation 14-1) determined that three separate resources related to the Ampex <br /> campus, the Ampex sign, Warnecke plaza and fountain and 425 Broadway building, are <br /> not listed on the National or State Historic Registers or on any historical resource survey <br /> but that they could be determined to have local historic significance even though they <br /> are not currently on a local historical listing. Based on this potential, the EIR analysis <br /> determined that the removal of the three resources could represent potentially <br /> significant unavoidable project and cumulative impacts; and <br /> WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(a)(4) allows a lead agency to <br /> determine that a resource is a historic resource despite the fact that the resource is not <br /> listed in the California Register of Historical Resources, a local register of historical <br /> resources, or a historical resources survey; and <br /> WHEREAS, on February 9, 2012, the Historic Resources Advisory Committee <br /> (HRAC) held a meeting and made recommendations to the Planning Commission <br /> including recommendations regarding contact with the Ampex campus architect and <br /> regarding the treatment of the three separate resources related to the Ampex campus: <br /> the Ampex sign, Warnecke plaza and fountain and 425 Broadway building; and <br /> WHEREAS, on February 21, 2012, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed <br /> public hearing and received public testimony on the DEIR. The City received a number <br /> of letters and emails from the public, responsible agencies, and interested parties and <br /> recommendations from the HRAC, as noted above, during and after the DEIR public <br /> review period; and <br /> WHEREAS, on April 12, 2012, the HRAC provided an update regarding contact <br /> with the Ampex campus architect and clarification of their prior recommendation to the <br /> Planning Commission that the Ampex sign, Warnecke fountain and plaza, and the 425 <br /> Broadway building are historic resources of aesthetic, educational, cultural, and <br /> architectural significance to the citizens of the City under Redwood City Municipal Code <br /> Section 40.3. Thus, the HRAC concluded that the three resources have special <br /> meaning to the community and therefore their removal would constitute a significant <br /> unavoidable impact under DEIR Section 14.1 (Cultural and Historic Resources <br /> Chapter). In addition, the HRAC recommended revising the DPR rating of the three <br /> separate resources related to the Ampex campus to Status Code 5 such that these <br /> resources are recognized as historically significant to Redwood City; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City prepared written responses to the comments received <br /> during the comment period and included these responses in the Final Environmental <br /> Impact Report for the Stanford in Redwood City Precise Plan Project and also prepared <br /> a document entitled Revisions to the Final Environmental Impact Report to make minor, <br /> clarifying revisions (together with the Draft EIR, the "Final EIR") and prepared a <br /> ATTY/RE50.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION RESO.#15294 <br /> REV:09-10-13 VR MUFF#100 <br /> Page 4 of 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.