My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15294
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE STANFORD IN REDWOOD CITY PRECISE PLAN; ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
09/09/2013 <br /> Exhibit B <br /> FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES <br /> Summary of Discussion of Alternatives in the Final EIR <br /> The Final EIR evaluates a number of potential alternatives to the Project. The EIR <br /> examines the environmental impacts of each alternative in comparison with the Project and the <br /> relative ability of each alternative to satisfy project objectives. <br /> The EIR also describes the criteria used to identify a range of reasonable alternatives for <br /> review in the EIR and describes proposals that the City concluded did not merit additional, <br /> more-detailed review because they did not present viable alternatives to the Project. <br /> The City Council's Findings Relating to Alternatives <br /> In making these findings, the City Council certifies that it has independently reviewed <br /> and considered the information on alternatives provided in the Final EIR, including the <br /> information provided in comments on the Draft EIR and the responses to those comments in the <br /> Final EIR. The Final EIR's discussion and analysis of these alternatives is not repeated in these <br /> findings, but the discussion and analysis of the alternatives in the Final EIR is incorporated in <br /> these findings by reference. <br /> The Final EIR describes and evaluates in detail five alternatives to the Project. The City <br /> Council has adopted mitigation measures that mitigate the significant environmental effects of <br /> the Project. While these mitigation measures will not mitigate all Project impacts to a less than <br /> significant level, they will mitigate those impacts to a level that the City Council finds is <br /> acceptable. The City Council finds that only the Project would satisfy all of the Project <br /> Objectives. The City Council finds that the remaining alternatives are unable to satisfy the <br /> project objectives to the same degree as the Project. The City Council further finds that, on <br /> balance, none of the remaining alternatives has environmental advantages over the Project that <br /> are sufficiently great to justify approval of such an alternative instead of the Project, in light of <br /> each such alternative's inability to satisfy the project objectives to the same degree as the <br /> Project. Accordingly, the City Council has determined to approve the Project instead of <br /> approving one of the remaining alternatives. <br /> In making this determination, the City Council finds that when compared to the other <br /> alternatives described and evaluated in the Final EIR, the Project, as mitigated, provides a <br /> reasonable balance between fully satisfying the project objectives and reducing potential <br /> environmental impacts to an acceptable level. The City Council further finds and determines that <br /> the Project should be approved, rather than one of the other alternatives, for the reasons set <br /> forth below. <br /> Description of Project Objectives <br /> The project objectives are to: <br /> Redevelop the project development site (formerly Midpoint <br /> Technology Center) for a Stanford University satellite location in a campus setting of sufficient <br /> size to accommodate the long-term needs of academic and academic support users for whom <br /> ATTY/RE50.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION RESO.#15294 <br /> REV:09-10-13 VR MUFF#100 <br /> Page 45 of 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.