My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15294
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE STANFORD IN REDWOOD CITY PRECISE PLAN; ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 <br /> MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements <br /> project impact would be considered less- <br /> than-significant. However,because this <br /> improvement would require Caltrans <br /> approval,the City cannot ensure the <br /> construction of this improvement. Without <br /> implementation of the proposed mitigation, <br /> the impact would be signii►cant and <br /> unavoidable. <br /> Impact 7-2: Existing Plus Project Impact Mitigation 7-2. To mitigate the projecYs Applicant to fully fund. City to monitor in Prior to building <br /> on Woodside Road/Bay Road Intersection. impact(i.e.,the project applicant would be Applicant or City to consultation with permit issuance that <br /> Under Existing Plus Project conditions during responsible for fully funding/completing the construct. C/CAG&Caltrans would result in <br /> the PM peak hour,project traffic would cause mitigation)at the intersection of Woodside 849,155 total square <br /> the intersection to degrade from LOS D(35.5 Road and Bay Road,the westbound feet in Precise Plan <br /> seconds delay)to LOS F(81.7 seconds approach on Bay Road would need to be Blocks A-E. Refer to <br /> delay). According to City guidelines,this restriped to include a total of two left-turn Stanford Precise <br /> change would constitute a signii►cant lanes and one shared through/right-turn Plan, Chapter IV, <br /> projectimpact. lane. (Woodside Road is considered north- Intersection <br /> south and Bay Road is considered east- Improvements Table. <br /> west.) The eastbound approach would <br /> need to be restriped to include a total of <br /> one left-turn lane,one through lane,and <br /> one shared through/right-turn lane. In <br /> addition,the signal phasing on the <br /> eastbound and westbound approaches <br /> would need to be modified from permitted <br /> phasing to protected phasing. Because <br /> this intersection is subject to Caltrans <br /> jurisdiction,any changes to the operation of <br /> the signal would require Caltrans approval. <br /> Pursuant to Caltrans Deputy Directives 64 <br /> and 64-R1, requiring facilitation of <br /> multimodal travel,it is possible that the <br /> above intersection improvements would <br /> also be required to include such features <br /> as new crosswalk and pedestrian signals <br /> across Bay Road on the west side of <br /> Woodside Road,restriping of two <br /> crosswalks on Woodside Road to provide <br /> straight and shorter walking distances, <br /> pedestrian median refuges on Woodside <br /> Road,curb ramps, pedestrian count-down <br /> signals,an emergency vehicle pre-emption <br /> system,reconstruction of corner radii to <br /> reduce pedestrian crossing distances,bike <br /> lanes,and bike detectors. <br /> With the improvements described above, <br /> the level of service LOS at this <br /> Page 2 ` r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc <br /> RESO. 15294 <br /> MUFF#100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.