Laserfiche WebLink
09/09/2013 <br /> impacts identified that will result with implementation of the Project. <br /> 11. Pursuant to CEQA Section 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines section 15091, <br /> and in support of its approval of the Project, the City Council has reviewed and <br /> considered the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program that requires all mitigation <br /> measures described in the Final EIR be implemented by means of Project conditions, <br /> agreements, or other measures, as set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting <br /> Program attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference, and adopts <br /> the Miti�gation Monitoring and Reporting Program. In addition, with respect to the <br /> mitigation measures, the City Council finds that: <br /> (a) Some of the intersection mitigation measures included in the <br /> Mitigation Monitoring Program cannot be implemented absent the approval of <br /> other agencies in addition to the City. These mitigation measures and the other <br /> agencies whose approvals are required are: (1) Mitigation 7-1 and 7-5 <br /> (Woodside Road/Broadway Intersection): Caltrans; (2) Mitigation 7-2, 7-6 and 7- <br /> 13 (Woodside Road/Bay Road Intersection): Caltrans; (3) Mitigation 7-12 <br /> (Veterans BIvd.NVoodside Road Intersection): Caltrans; (4) Mitigation 7-14 <br /> (Woodside Road/Middlefield Road Intersection): Caltrans; and (5) Mitigation 7-18 <br /> (Marsh Road/Scott Drive Intersection): City of Menlo Park. The City Council <br /> hereby finds that these mitigation measures are partly within the jurisdiction of <br /> other public agencies and can and should be approved by those other agencies. <br /> If any of these mitigation measures is not approved by the other agency listed, <br /> that mitigation measure will be infeasible. <br /> (b) The Draft EIR identified one potential mitigation measure that is <br /> infeasible, as follows: Mitigation 7-11 and 7-19 - Widening of US 101 to add <br /> mixed flow lane. The City Council finds that this mitigation measure is infeasible <br /> because, although the US 101 segments near the Project site currently operate <br /> at levels of service E and F, Caltrans, which has jurisdiction over improvements <br /> to US 101, has no plans to widen the affected freeway segments due to right of <br /> way limitations. <br /> 12. The City Council directs the City's Community Development Department <br /> to file a notice of determination with the County Clerk of San Mateo County upon <br /> approval of the Project. <br /> 13. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(e), the documents and other <br /> materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council has <br /> based its determinations are located in and may be obtained from, the Office of the City <br /> Clerk at 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, California. The City Clerk is the <br /> custodian of records for all matters before the City. <br /> 14. This Resolution is effective upon its adoption. <br /> * * * <br /> ATTY/RESO.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION RESO.#15294 <br /> REV:09-10-13 VR MUFF#100 <br /> Page 7 of 55 <br />