Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 <br /> MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements <br /> operation at the time of construction of <br /> the child care center,and if the detailed <br /> analysis described above shows PMZ.S <br /> levels exceeding the 0.3�ag/m3 <br /> standard throughout the development <br /> site,construction and operation of a <br /> child care center on the development <br /> site shall be prohibited. If the detailed <br /> analysis shows that some or all of the <br /> development site would be exposed to <br /> PMZ.S levels lower than 0.3�ag/m3,the <br /> outdoor use area for the child care <br /> center shall be sited in one of those <br /> locations. <br /> Implementation of these measures would <br /> reduce this impact to a less-than- <br /> si nii►cant level. <br /> CLIMATE CHANGE <br /> Impact 9-1: Sea Level Rise Impacts on Mitigation 9-1. For all new development Applicant City Prior to grading <br /> Project Development. Based on the BCDC on the project development site,the City permit issuance; <br /> sea level rise maps,the project may be shall ensure that the development complies prior to building <br /> affected by anticipated sea level rise and with the most current Redwood City permit issuance;field <br /> associated changes in broader flood plain General Plan and Redwood City Municipal verify implementation <br /> boundaries. Potential impacts associated Code requirements for protection from during grading and <br /> with future development that may be subject flood hazards,consistent with Mitigation construction <br /> to sea level rise include risk to public safety 10-3 in chapter 10(Utilities),of this EIR. <br /> and property damage,representing a These provisions would require compliance <br /> potentiallysignii►cant impact. with associated storm drainage storage, <br /> building elevation,and flood-proofing <br /> requirements. Implementation of these <br /> measures would be expected to reduce this <br /> im act to a less-than-si nii►cant level. <br /> UTILITIES <br /> Impact 10-1: Need for Emergency Potable Mitigation 10-1. Based on the projected Applicant fair share City Prior to building <br /> Water Storage. Project development would emergency potable water storage permit issuance for <br /> require emergency potable water storage per requirement for the proposed project,the net new <br /> City requirements. Because the project applicant shall contribute the funds development,to be <br /> infrastructure(e.g.,water tank and equivalent to the cost of providing 490 implemented <br /> distribution system)necessary to meet this equivalent dwelling units(EDU)($1.5 proportionately as <br /> requirement has not been incorporated as a million in 2011 dollars)of emergency net new development <br /> component of the proposed project,the need potable water storage towards the design occurs. Refer to <br /> for emergency potable water storage and construction of the planned off-site Stanford Precise <br /> represents a potentiallysignii►cant project areawide storage facility. Implementation Plan, Chapter III, <br /> im act. of this measure would reduce the identified Phasing/ <br /> Page 22 22 r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc <br /> RESO. 15294 <br /> MUFF#100 <br />