Res13 15294 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements project impact to a less-than-signii►cant Implementation level. Summary Table-- item 17--for emergency fire/water storage timing and im lementation. Impact 10-2: Increased Peak Wastewater Mitigation 10-2. At the time that Applicant fully fund or City; FOSMD;County Prior to building Flows in the Local FOSMD Collection construction of net new square footage on fair share Engineering permit issuance for System. It is estimated that the proposed the project development site is proposed, Department new square footage project development site's peak wastewater the applicanYs engineer shall work with beyond the existing flows to the FOSMD sewer system would be FOSMD and the San Mateo County 537,000 square feet, approximately 4.5 times the flow under Engineering Department to verify that the evaluate whether existing(full occupancy)conditions,from 112 local FOSMD sewer network, particularly need for upgrade gallons per minute(gpm)to 627 gpm. Based lines 100 and 200, has adequate capacity exists and if so, on information provided by the County for the proposed increment of calculate applicanYs Department of Public Works,it has not yet developmenYs peak wastewater flow rate. funding been confirmed whether the two existing If an inadequacy is found and the proposed responsibility. Refer sewer lines that would carry this increased increment of development represents the to Stanford Precise wastewater flow across the freeway have entire cause of the capacity shortfall,the Plan, Chapter III, sufficient capacity to accommodate such an applicant shall bear full responsibility for Phasing/ increase. It has therefore been funding the required improvements to Implementation conservatively determined for this EIR that FOSMD's system;if the proposed Summary Table-- additional project-related flows could increment of development does not item 18--for sewage represent a potentiallysignii►cant project represent the entire cause of such an transmission and wastewater collection system capacity incapacity,the applicant shall pay its fair collection upgrade impact. share of the cost of such improvements. timing and Implementation of this measure in implementation. accordance with the policies and standards of the FOSMD Master Plan would reduce the identified wastewater collection system capacity impact to a less-than-signii►cant level. Impact 10-3: Increased Risk of Flooding Mitigation 10-3. The project shall not Applicant City Prior to grading Resulting from Loss of Existing Detention increase off-site flooding compared to permit issuance; Storage. The project development site existing conditions. Finished grades within prior to building would be substantially reconfigured,with the portions of the project development site permit issuance;field replacement of all existing buildings and located outside the proposed building verify implementation elimination of a large part of the existing at- envelopes shall be set at an average during grading and grade parking. If the associated regrading elevation that maintains,at a minimum,the construction and construction of new buildings reduces existing volume of on-site stormwater the existing volume of on-site detention detention storage, until such time as the storage,flood levels on the project City's downstream discharge constraints development site and elsewhere within the (e.g., Bayfront Canal)are resolved and the basin could rise compared to current storage is no longer needed to protect the conditions. This possible project-related project improvements and improved worsening of existing flooding conditions properties in the adjoining neighborhoods. re resentsa otentiall si nii►cantim act. Page 23 23 r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc RESO. 15294 MUFF#100