My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15294
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE STANFORD IN REDWOOD CITY PRECISE PLAN; ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 <br /> MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements <br /> mitigation measures set forth in this EIR <br /> chapter. <br /> The requirement described in Mitigation 15- <br /> 1 for peer review of the recommended <br /> design-level geotechnical investigations,as <br /> well as for certification by the project civil <br /> engineer that all provisions of the <br /> investigation have been incorporated into <br /> the projecYs design and construction, <br /> would also apply to this mitigation and to all <br /> subsequent geotechnical and soils <br /> mitigation measures set forth in this EIR <br /> cha ter. <br /> Impact 15-5: Expansive Soils. Near- Mitigation 15-5. The detailed,design-level Applicant City Prior to grading <br /> surface clay soils subjected to seasonal geotechnical investigations required for permit issuance; <br /> cycles of wetting and drying can undergo each project construction phase under prior to building <br /> significant volume changes,expanding when Mitigation 15-1 shall include an evaluation permit issuance;field <br /> wet and shrinking when dry. Structures of the likely effects of building on expansive verify implementation <br /> based in these materials would be subjected soils and shall recommend specific during grading and <br /> to significant stresses that could destabilize measures designed to minimize soil construction <br /> foundations and cause cracking or heaving of movement and/or counter its potentially <br /> floor slabs and exterior pavements. These destructive effects. Implementation of <br /> possible expansive soil effects represent a these measures would reduce the potential <br /> potentiallysignii►cant impact. expansive soil impacts to a less-than- <br /> si nii►cant level. <br /> Impact 15-6: Seismically Induced Mitigation 15-6. The detailed,design-level Applicant City Prior to grading <br /> Settlement. Development of the proposed geotechnical investigations required under permit issuance; <br /> project would place new commercial Mitigation 15-1 for each project prior to building <br /> buildings in an area that could experience construction phase shall include a site- permit issuance;field <br /> rapid,excessive settlement in response to specific evaluation of the liquefaction and verify implementation <br /> earthquake-induced ground shaking during settlement potential at each proposed during grading and <br /> the useful life of the project improvements. building location. The investigations shall construction <br /> These possible responses to anticipated also propose measures as needed to offset <br /> seismic activity represent a potentially the effects of liquefaction-induced <br /> significantimpact. settlement,eitherthrough stabilization of <br /> the most vulnerable sand layers or through <br /> utilization of building foundation, utility <br /> connection,and pavement designs that <br /> can withstand the anticipated degree of <br /> total and differential settlement. <br /> Implementation of these measures would <br /> reduce these potential seismically induced <br /> settlement impacts to a less-than- <br /> signii►cant level. <br /> Page 35 35 r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc <br /> RESO. 15294 <br /> MUFF#100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.