My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15294
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:50:36 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE STANFORD IN REDWOOD CITY PRECISE PLAN; ADOPTING CEQA FINDINGS; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IDENTIFIED IN THE EIR; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 <br /> MONITORING VERIFICATION <br /> IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements <br /> cover of buildings, pavements and accordance with the provisions of the prior to building <br /> landscaping,potentially leaving soils exposed projecYs City-approved Stormwater permit issuance;field <br /> to wind and water erosion during the Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP). The verify implementation <br /> construction period. Eroded soils would be erosion control plan would be implemented during grading and <br /> washed into on-site drainage facilities that throughout project construction,and would construction <br /> discharge to the Bayfront Canal and San include measures for the post-construction <br /> Francisco Bay. Deposition of these soils stabilization of all disturbed ground. <br /> through natural sedimentation could <br /> adversely affect the carrying capacity of drain Implementation of this measure would <br /> lines, pumping equipment and open reduce these potential soil erosion impacts <br /> channels, increasing flooding potential and to a less-than-signii►cantlevel. <br /> maintenance requirements. In addition, <br /> suspended sediment would degrade water <br /> quality in the canal and in the bay by <br /> increasing turbidity levels. These possible <br /> effects of project-related soil erosion <br /> re resent a otentiall si nii►cantim act. <br /> Impact 15�: Settlement and Foundation Mitigation 15�. The detailed,design-level Applicant City Prior to grading <br /> Movement. The projecYs preliminary geotechnical investigations required under permit issuance; <br /> geotechnical studies determined that Mitigation 15-1 for each project prior to building <br /> structural loads imposed by buildings more construction phase shall include a permit issuance;field <br /> than approximately three stories in height thickness and consolidation analysis of all verify implementation <br /> would likely exceed the bearing capacity of clay soils underlying proposed building during grading and <br /> either fill or weakly consolidated Bay mud locations. This analysis shall be sufficient construction <br /> underlying conventional shallow foundations. to accurately estimate the rate and total <br /> Such buildings would potentially experience amount of consolidation expected to occur <br /> gradual but excessive long-term total and in response to building construction,as well <br /> differential settlements. These possible as the likely magnitude of differential <br /> settlement effects represent a potentially settlement. Building foundations,surface <br /> significant impact. improvements,and utility connections shall <br /> be designed to structurally withstand the <br /> associated movement,without disrupting <br /> either pedestrian or vehicular connections <br /> to the building. Implementation of these <br /> measures would reduce the potential <br /> compressible soil and settlement impacts <br /> to a less-than-signii►cant level. <br /> The requirement described in Mitigation 15- <br /> 1 for peer review of the recommended <br /> design-level geotechnical investigations,as <br /> well as for certification by the project civil <br /> engineer that all provisions of the <br /> investigation have been incorporated into <br /> the projecYs design and construction, <br /> would also apply to this mitigation and to all <br /> subsequent geotechnical and soils <br /> Page 34 34 r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc <br /> RESO. 15294 <br /> MUFF#100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.