|
11/16/2015
<br /> automobile parking spaces, and satisfaction of the remaining 118 required parking
<br /> spaces through the payment of in-lieu fees (Eight-Story Proposal); and
<br /> WHEREAS, the matter was duly noticed for the continued public hearing before
<br /> the City Council on November 16, 2015; and
<br /> WHEREAS, on November 16, 2015, the City Council continued the public
<br /> hearing in accordance with all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and
<br /> the Redwood City Municipal Code, all applicable requirements of the State Planning
<br /> and Zoning Law, the City Zoning Ordinance and the Downtown Precise Plan, to
<br /> consider the appeals of the Nine-Story Project, and received and considered oral and
<br /> documentary evidence on the appeals and application; and
<br /> WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Revised Initial Study checklist,
<br /> dated September 21, 2015, prepared by the City's Planning Division and its findings,
<br /> the previously certified Downtown Precise Plan Program EIR (State Clearinghouse
<br /> #2006052027), and the entire record of the administrative proceedings regarding
<br /> the adoption of the Downtown Precise Plan (including without limitation the
<br /> Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan attached to Resolution No. 15086
<br /> adopted on January 24, 2011); and
<br /> WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the proposed Eight-Story
<br /> Proposal, consisting of a Vesting Tentative Map, Downtown Planned Community
<br /> Permit including one guideline deviation, and the Parking In-Lieu Fee Application
<br /> would further the purposes of and appropriately implement the City of Redwood
<br /> City General Plan, the Downtown Precise Plan, and applicable provisions of the
<br /> Subdivision Map Act, the Redwood City Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance.
<br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
<br /> CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AS FOLLOWS:
<br /> Section1 . The City Council, having independently heard, considered and
<br /> weighed all the evidence in the record, including evidence presented by City staff, the
<br /> Applicant, the Appellants and members of the public, and being fully informed of the
<br /> Nine-Story Project, the Planning Commission's decision, and the appeal, finds that the
<br /> Appellants have not shown, based on evidence in the record, that the Planning
<br /> Commission's decision was made in error, that there was an abuse of discretion by the
<br /> Planning Commission, that the Planning Commission's decision was otherwise
<br /> improper, or that the City's notices, agendas, and appeal procedures were unlawful in
<br /> any manner, and, in the exercise of its independent judgment, hereby denies the
<br /> appeals and approves the Eight-Story Proposal consisting of a Vesting Tentative Map,
<br /> Downtown Planned Community Permit including one guideline deviation, and the
<br /> ATTY/RES0.3157/SA RESO 601 MARSHALL APPEAL 8-STORY PROJECT RESO.#15458
<br /> REV:11-16-15 VR MUFF#603
<br /> Page 4 of 23
<br />
|