Laserfiche WebLink
OAK #4823-0464-7229 v3 72Comment # Section(s) of Plan Applicable To Summarized Comment Response Resolution lands, such as the lands upon which Docktown is located, and the State has indicated that private residential use is inconsistent with such public access. 30 Entire Plan Why do occupants have to move? And what relocation assistance will be provided? Commenter identified themselves as resident of Santa Cruz and not impacted by relocation of Live Aboard occupancy at Docktown. Commenter is encouraged to review the plan and other documents available online at http://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/planning-housing/planning-services/docktown-marina No Change to Document 31 Not Specific to Draft Docktown Plan's Content or Intent Disagrees with lawsuit filed by Ted Hanning against the City of Redwood City and method of relocation. Comments received. Will be shared with City Council. No Change to Document 32 Not Specific to Draft Docktown Plan's Content or Intent Commenter supports continuing to explore legislative options. Concerns regarding the re-use of the site and potential that the site will be abandoned or vacant long-term and becoming blighted. Comments received. Will be shared with City Council. No Change to Document