Res18 15665 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

05/21/2018 Declaration (MND), NMPP Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting checklist (MMR), the entire record of the administrative proceedings regarding the adoption of the NMPP, the General Plan, the staff reports and attachments prepared for the Planning Commission hearing on the Project and the appeal, each of which is incorporated herein by reference and which serve as an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution. Section 2. CEQA: In the exercise of its independent judgement, the City Council finds that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Class 32 - 'Infill Development Projects"), as further explained in the CEQA Memorandum, because: a. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; and b. The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; and c. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; and d. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Pursuant to Guidelines section 15091(e), the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council has based its decision are located in and may be obtained from, the Office of the City Clerk at 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City California. The City Clerk is the custodian of records for all matters before the City. Section 3. Planned Community Permit DPC2016-05: In the exercise of its independent judgment, the City Council finds that: a. The Project and improvements proposed by Planned Community Permit DPC2016-05 are consistent with, conform to the intent of, and will appropriately implement the North Main Street Precise Plan for the 353 Main Street project; and b. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the project and improvements proposed by Planned Community permit DPC2016-05 will not, under the circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, or general welfare AM/RESO.0041/CC RE50 DENYING THE APPEAL FOR 353 MAIN STREET RESO. NO. 15665 REV: 05-14-18 PR MUFF NO. 603 Page 4 of 29