My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res04 14576
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2000-2009
>
Res04 14576
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 9:53:38 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 9:53:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/12/2004
Description
RESOLUTION OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL 2702
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
04/12/2004 <br />ORIGINAL <br />RESOLUTION NO. 14576 <br />RESOLUTION OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL 2702 <br />WHEREAS, the health and welfare of the people of Redwood City are best <br />served by maintaining local zoning authority over land use decisions; and <br />WHEREAS, Assembly <br />Bill 2702 (AB <br />2702), authored by Assemblyman Darrell <br />Steinberg, <br />seeks to impose <br />many onerous <br />mandates on local land use and zoning <br />issues, in <br />a "one- size - fits -all" <br />approach across the State which effectively pre -empts <br />Redwood <br />City's and all local <br />governments' <br />zoning authority and flexibility in land use <br />decisions: <br />and <br />WHEREAS, this bill will repeal and revise existing second unit law, raising <br />questions about the validity of existing local ordinances; mandates that second units be <br />allowed in all residential zones, thus drastically curtailing the current flexibility of local <br />governments to decide in which zones to allow second units; and <br />WHEREAS, this bill will also prohibit local governments from imposing height, <br />setback, lot coverage, fees, and other requirements that may "unreasonably restrict" the <br />rights of a property owner to construct and maintain a second unit on their property, <br />thus throwing into question the validity of any generally applicable ordinance, providing <br />property owners with the ability to question any provision of a local ordinance, and <br />establishing potential "takings" claims against local governments; and <br />WHEREAS, if made into law this bill will prohibit local governments from <br />restricting second unit occupancy to seniors or family members; prohibits local <br />governments from establishing a minimum or maximum size requirement that is less <br />than 600 square feet, unless requested by the property owner; reduces local parking <br />requirements by limiting parking to one space per unit; and prohibits local governments <br />from requiring covered parking; and <br />WHEREAS, in regard to school site housing, AB 2702 pre -empts local zoning <br />affecting housing on school sites by stating that when a school district agrees to allow <br />single - family or multifamily housing to be built on a school site, the density shall be the <br />maximum density allowed on any multifamily -zoned parcel within 300 feet or within the <br />community plan, plus increases for density bonus projects. <br />WHEREAS, in summary AB 2702 represents the legislature's attempt to dictate <br />an unrealistic and impractical universal standard, usurp local government zoning <br />authority, and disregard local conditions such as location, traffic, site conditions, and <br />other local issues; and <br />Atty /Reso /Reso.1459 14576 <br />040503 1 Muff # 214 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.