My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res04 14590
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2000-2009
>
Res04 14590
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 9:54:01 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 9:53:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/7/2004
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS CONCERNING MITIGATION MEASURES, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, MAKING FINDINGS CONCERNING ALTERNATIVES, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR MARINA SHORES VILLAGE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
06/07/2004 <br />intersection by more than five seconds during the AM and PM peak hours, periods <br />during which the intersection would be expected to operate at an unacceptable level of <br />service even absent the addition of Project traffic. The intersection is also expected to <br />meet the CalTrans "Peak Hour Volume Warrant" for traffic signal installation during the <br />AM and PM peak hours (Impact 7 -17). <br />Mitigation: The project applicant shall be required to make a fair share <br />contribution toward either of two alternative mitigations: 1) installation of a traffic signal <br />at the intersection, widening of the northbound approach to include a dedicated left turn <br />lane and a shared through /right -turn lane, and reconfiguration of the southbound <br />approach to include a dedicated left turn lane and a shared through /right -turn lane; or 2) <br />installation of a roundabout at the intersection (Mitigation 7 -17). <br />Findings: The mitigation measure described above is feasible and will <br />reduce the cumulative impact described above to a less- than - significant level. <br />S. Cumulative (2020) Impact on the Alameda de las Pulaas/Woodside <br />Road Intersection <br />Potential Impact: By 2020, assuming the addition of traffic generated by <br />all other approved and pending projects in the vicinity, the addition of Initial Project <br />traffic would have been expected to increase the average delay at the Alameda de las <br />Pulgas/Woodside Road intersection by more than five seconds during the AM peak <br />hour, a period during which the intersection would already be expected to operate at an <br />unacceptable level of service even absent the Project (Impact 7 -18). However, the <br />Project, which is essentially identical to FEIR Alternative 6 for this purpose, is not <br />expected to have a significant cumulative impact at this intersection. <br />Mitigation: The Project is required under the Marina Shores Precise Plan <br />to achieve a fifteen percent (15 %) reduction in trips through implementation of <br />Transportation Demand Management programs ( "TDM "). This requirement is fully <br />enforceable by a provision which permits the City to withhold building permits if the 15% <br />reduction is not achieved. No further mitigation is required. <br />Findings: Adoption of the Project, in place of the Initial Project, results in <br />this impact being less than significant. <br />T. Cumulative (2020) Impact on the Broadway/Woodside Road <br />Intersection <br />Potential Impact: By 2020, assuming the addition of traffic generated by <br />all other approved and pending projects in the vicinity, the addition of Initial Project <br />traffic would have been expected to increase the average delay at the <br />Broadway/Woodside Road intersection by more than five seconds during the PM peak <br />hour, a period during which the intersection would already be expected to operate at an <br />unacceptable level of service even absent the Project (Impact 7 -19). However, the <br />Project, which is essentially identical to FEIR Alternative 6 for this purpose, is not <br />expected to have a significant cumulative impact at this intersection. <br />1289 \02 \179278.2 15 <br />Atty /Reso /Reso.1470 14590 <br />060804 Muff # 304 Bin 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.